Abstract A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction
首页> 外文期刊>Computational statistics & data analysis >A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction
【24h】

A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction

机译:关于评估自回归时间序列预测的交叉验证有效性的说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractOne of the most widely used standard procedures for model evaluation in classification and regression isK-fold cross-validation (CV). However, when it comes to time series forecasting, because of the inherent serial correlation and potential non-stationarity of the data, its application is not straightforward and often replaced by practitioners in favour of an out-of-sample (OOS) evaluation. It is shown that for purely autoregressive models, the use of standardK-fold CV is possible provided the models considered have uncorrelated errors. Such a setup occurs, for example, when the models nest a more appropriate model. This is very common when Machine Learning methods are used for prediction, and where CV can control for overfitting the data. Theoretical insights supporting these arguments are presented, along with a simulation study and a real-world example. It is shown empirically thatK-fold CV performs favourably compared to both OOS evaluation and other time-series-specific techniques such as non-dependent cross-validation.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ Abstract 最广泛使用的分类和回归中的模型评估的标准过程之一是 k - 折叠交叉验证(CV)。然而,在时间序列预测方面,由于数据的固有串行相关和数据的潜在非公平性,其应用并不直接,并且经常被从业者取代,以支持样本外(OOS)评估。结果表明,对于纯粹的自回归模型,使用标准 K -FOLD CV是可能的,只要考虑的型号具有不相关的错误。例如,当模型嵌套更合适的模型时发生这种设置。当机器学习方法用于预测时,这是非常常见的,并且CV可以控制用于过度接种数据的位置。提供了支持这些论点的理论见解,以及模拟研究和一个真实的榜样。经验上示出了 K - 与OOS评估和其他时间序列特定技术(如非依赖交叉验证)相比,有利地执行。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号