首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Psychology >The role of domain-general cognitive resources in children's construction of a vitalist theory of biology
【24h】

The role of domain-general cognitive resources in children's construction of a vitalist theory of biology

机译:领域 - 一般认知资源在儿童建设生物学生物学理论中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some episodes of learning are easier than others. Preschoolers can learn certain facts, such as "my grandmother gave me this purse," only after one or two exposures (easy to learn; fast mapping), but they require several years to learn that plants are alive or that the sun is not alive (hard to learn). One difference between the two kinds of knowledge acquisition is that hard cases often require conceptual construction, such as the construction of the biological concept alive, whereas easy cases merely involve forming new beliefs formulated over concepts the child already has (belief revision, a form of knowledge enrichment). We asked whether different domain-general cognitive resources support these two types of knowledge acquisition (conceptual construction and knowledge enrichment that supports fast mapping) by testing 82 6-year-olds in a pretraining/training/post-training study. We measured children's improvement in an episode involving theory construction (the beginning steps of acquisition of the framework theory of vitalist biology, which requires conceptual change) and in an episode involving knowledge enrichment alone (acquisition of little known facts about animals, such as the location of crickets' ears and the color of octopus blood). In addition, we measured children's executive functions and receptive vocabulary to directly compare the resources drawn upon in the two episodes of learning. We replicated and extended previous findings highlighting the differences between conceptual construction and knowledge enrichment, and we found that Executive Functions predict improvement on the Vitalism battery but not on the Fun Facts battery and that Receptive Vocabulary predicts improvement the Fun Facts battery but not on the Vitalism battery. This double dissociation provides new evidence for the distinction between the two types of knowledge acquisition, and bears on the nature of the learning mechanisms involved in each.
机译:一些学习剧集比其他剧集更容易。学龄前儿童可以学习某些事实,例如“我的祖母给了我这个钱包”,只有一个或两个曝光(易于学习;快速映射),但他们需要几年来学习植物活着或太阳不活着(难以学习)。两种知识获取之间的一个差异是硬壳常常需要概念构建,例如生物概念的建设活着,而简单的案例只是涉及形成在孩子已经拥有的概念(信仰修订的概念上的新信念(信仰修订,一种形式知识富集)。我们询问不同的域一般认知资源是否支持这两种类型的知识获取(概念建设和知识丰富,通过在预先训练/培训/培训/培训课程学习中测试82名6岁儿童。我们衡量了儿童在涉及理论建设的集中的进一步(获取vitalist生物学框架理论的开始步骤,这需要概念变化)以及涉及知识丰富的集中(收购关于动物的知名事实,例如地点蟋蟀的耳朵和章鱼血的颜色)。此外,我们衡量了儿童的行政功能和接受词汇,直接比较了在两个学习集中绘制的资源。我们复制并扩展了先前的调查结果,突出了概念建设和知识丰富之间的差异,我们发现执行功能预测了对生命派电池的改善,但没有关于有趣的事实电池,接受词汇预测电池的改善,但不在富生物剧上电池。这种双重解析提供了新的证据,以区分这两种类型的知识获取,并承担各自所涉及的学习机制的性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号