...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup
【24h】

Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup

机译:髋关节切除后股骨头自体移植髋臼患者血管啮齿动物血管啮齿动物癌症的髋臼重建是耐用的短期跟踪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Pelvic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection is technically difficult and characterized by a high complication rate. Although endoprosthetic replacement can result in immediate postoperative functional recovery, biologic reconstructions with autograft may provide an enhanced prognosis in patients with long-term survival; however, little has been published regarding this approach. We therefore wished to evaluate whether whole-bulk femoral head autograft that is not contaminated by tumor can be used to reconstruct segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors. Questions/purposes In a pilot study, we evaluated (1) local tumor control, (2) complications, and (3) postoperative function as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Methods Between 2009 and 2015, we treated 13 patients with periacetabular malignant or aggressive benign tumors with en bloc resection, bulk femoral head autograft, and cemented THA (with or without a titanium acetabular reconstruction cup), and all were included for analysis here. During that time, the general indications for this approach were (1) patients anticipated to have a good oncologic prognosis and adequate surgical margins to allow this approach, (2) patients whose pelvic bone defects did not exceed two types (Types I + II or Types II + III as defined by Enneking and Dunham), and (3) patients whose medical insurance would not cover what otherwise might have been a pelvic tumor prosthesis. During this period, another 91 patients were treated with pelvic prosthetic replacement, which was our preferred approach. Median followup in this study was 36 months (range, 24–99 months among surviving patients; one patient died 8 months after surgery); no patients were lost to followup. Bone defects were Types II + III in five patients, and Types I + II in eight. After intraarticular resection, ipsilateral femoral head autograft combined with THA was used to reconstruct the segmental bone defect of the acetabulum. In patients with Types I + II resections, the connection between the sacrum and the acetabulum was reestablished with a fibular autograft or a titanium cage filled with dried bone-allograft particles which was enhanced by using a pedicle screw and rod system. Functional evaluation was done in 11 patients who remained alive and maintained the femoral head autograft at final followup; one other patient received secondary resection involving removal of the femoral head autograft and internal fixation, and was excluded from functional evaluation. Endpoints were assessed by chart review. Results Two patients experienced local tumor recurrence. Finally, eight patients did not show signs of the disease, one patient died of disease for local and distant tumor relapse, and four patients survived, but still had the disease. Three of these four patients had distant metastases without local recurrence and one had local control after secondary resection but still experienced system relapse. We observed the following complications: hematoma (one patient; treated surgically with hematoma clearance), delayed wound healing (one patient; treated by débridement), deep vein thrombosis (one patient), and hip dislocation (one patient; treated with open reduction). The median 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 83% (25 of 30 points; range, 19–29 points), and all patients were community ambulators; one used a cane, three used a walker, and nine did not use any assistive devices. Conclusions In this small series at short-term followup, we found that reconstruction of segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors with femoral head autograft does not appear to impede local tumor control; complications were in the range of what might be expected in a series of large pelvic reconstructions, and postoperative function was generally good. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
机译:摘要背景腹膜腹膜切除术后骨盆重建在技术上困难,并以高并发症率特征。虽然内置替代替代物可以导致立即术后官能恢复,但具有自体移植的生物重建可为长期存活患者提供增强的预后;但是,很少有关于这种方法发布的。因此,我们希望评估未被肿瘤污染的全块股骨头自体移植物是否可用于在整个髋部肿瘤切除后重建节段骨缺陷。试点研究中的问题/目的,我们评估(1)局部肿瘤对照,(2)并发症,(3)由肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会得分测量的术后功能。方法2009年至2015年,我们将13例患有Zhoc切除切除,散装股骨头自体移植物和粘附的Tha(有或没有钛髋臼重建杯)的患者治疗13名患者,并包括在此处进行分析。在此期间,这种方法的一般适应症是(1)患者预期具有良好的肿瘤性预后和充足的手术边缘,以允许这种方法,(2)骨盆骨缺损不超过两种类型的患者(I型+ II或类型由II + III型由II + III所定义),(3)医疗保险不会涵盖患有盆腔假体的患者。在此期间,另外91名患者被骨盆假肢更换治疗,这是我们的首选方法。本研究中的中位关注为36个月(范围,患者中生存患者24-99个月;一名患者在手术后8个月死亡);没有患者失去动力。在五名患者中,骨缺损是II + III型,以及八种+ II的类型。在术中切除术后,使用与TH结合的同侧股头用于重建髋臼的节段性骨缺陷。在I + II型切除术患者中,骶骨和髋臼之间的连接是用毛毡自体移植物或填充有干燥的骨 - 同种异体移植颗粒的钛笼,通过使用椎弓根螺钉和杆系统增强。功能评估是在11名患者中仍然活着的,并在最终的跟进中保持股骨头自体移植物;另一种患者接受涉及去除股骨头自体移植和内固定的二次切除,并且被排除在功能评估之外。通过图表审查评估终点。结果两名患者经历了局部肿瘤复发。最后,八名患者没有显示出疾病的迹象,一名患者死于局部和远处肿瘤复发疾病,4名患者存活,但仍有疾病。这四名患者中的三个患者在没有局部复发的情况下具有远距离转移,二次切除后局部对照,但仍然经历过系统复发。我们观察到以下并发症:血肿(一名患者;手术治疗血肿清除),延迟伤口愈合(一名患者;由Déricement治疗),深静脉血栓形成(一名患者)和髋关节脱位(一名患者;用开放的患者处理) 。中位数1993年肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会得分为83%(25分,共30分;范围,19-29点),所有患者都是社区救护车;一个人使用甘蔗,三个使用助行器,九个没有使用任何辅助设备。结论在这种小系列在短期随访中,我们发现,在股骨头自体移植术后,患有股骨头自身移植的椎间胎瘤外部分段骨缺损的重建并不妨碍局部肿瘤控制;并发症在一系列大盆腔重建中可能预期的范围,术后函数通常很好。证据水平IV,治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号