...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Are There Nationwide Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in the Use of Outpatient Orthopaedic Services?
【24h】

Are There Nationwide Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in the Use of Outpatient Orthopaedic Services?

机译:在使用门诊骨科服务时是否有全国社会经济和人口差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Although disparities in the use of healthcare services in the United States have been well-documented, information examining sociodemographic disparities in the use of healthcare services (for example, office-based and emergency department [ED] care) for nonemergent musculoskeletal conditions is limited. Questions/purposes This study was designed to answer two important questions: (1) Are there identifiable nationwide sociodemographic disparities in the use of either office-based orthopaedic care or ED care for common, nonemergent musculoskeletal conditions? (2) Is there a meaningful difference in expenditures associated with these same conditions when care is provided in the office rather than the ED? Methods This study analyzed data from the 2007 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The MEPS is a nationally representative database administered by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that tracks patient interactions with the healthcare system and expenditures associated with each visit, making it an ideal data source for our study. Differences in the use of office-based and ED care were assessed across different socioeconomic and demographic groups. Healthcare expenditures associated with office-based and ED care were tabulated for each of the musculoskeletal conditions included in this study. The MEPS database defines expenditures as direct payments, including out-of-pocket payments and payments from insurances. In all, 63,514 participants were included in our study. Fifty-one percent (32,177 of 63,514) of patients were aged 35 to 64 years and 29% were older than 65 years (18,445 of 63,514). Women comprised 58% (37,031 of 63,514) of our population, while men comprised 42% (26,483 of 63,514). Our study was limited to the following eight categories of common, nonemergent musculoskeletal conditions: osteoarthritis (40%, 25,200 of 63,514), joint derangement (0.5%, 285 of 63,514), other joint conditions (43%, 27,499 of 63,514), muscle or ligament conditions (6%, 3726 of 63,514), bone or cartilage conditions (8%, 5035 of 63,514), foot conditions (1%, 585 of 63,514), fractures (7%, 4189 of 63,514), and sprains or strains (18%, 11,387 of 63,514). Multivariable logistic regression was used to ascertain which demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors were independently associated with differences in the use of office-based orthopaedic services and ED care for musculoskeletal conditions. Furthermore, expenditures over the course of our study period for each of our musculoskeletal categories were calculated per visit in both the outpatient and the ED settings, and adjusted for inflation. Results After controlling for covariates like age, gender, region, insurance status, income, education level, and self-reported health status, we found substantially lower use of outpatient musculoskeletal care among patients who were Hispanic (odds ratio 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.86]; p < 0.001), non-Hispanic black (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70 to 0.84]; p < 0.001), lesser-educated (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.81]; p < 0.001), lower-income (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.88]; p < 0.001), and nonprivately-insured (OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.91]; p < 0.001). Public insurance status (OR 1.30 [95% CI 1.17 to 1.44]; p < 0.001), lower income (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.28 to 1.82]; p < 0.001), and lesser education status (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.14 to 1.60]; p = 0.001) were also associated with greater use of musculoskeletal care in the ED.
机译:背景技术虽然在美国使用医疗保健服务的差异已被充分记录,但在使用医疗保健服务(例如,办公室为基础的和急诊部门[ED]护理)时,审查社会渗透差异的信息是有限的。问题/目的本研究旨在回答两个重要问题:(1)在使用任何基于办公室的整形外科护理或常见的非体性肌肉骨骼条件的情况下有可识别的全国各种社会渗透性吗? (2)在办公室在办公室而不是ED时提供相同条件的支出有意义的支出差异吗?方法本研究分析了2007年至2015年医疗支出面板调查(MEP)的数据。 MEPS是由原子能机构管理的全国代表性数据库,用于医疗研究和质量,追踪与每次访问相关的医疗保健系统和支出的患者互动,使其成为我们研究的理想数据来源。在不同的社会经济和人口组中评估了基于办公和ED护理的使用的差异。针对本研究中包含的每种肌肉骨骼条件列表了与办公室和ED护理相关的医疗费用。 MEPS数据库将支出定义为直接付款,包括从保险的购股票支付和付款。总之,我们的研究中包含63,514名参与者。患者50%(32,177人)患者年龄35至64岁,29%以上超过65岁(18,445名,共63,514名)。妇女组成了我们人口的58%(37,031人,共有63,514人),而男性占42%(26,483名,共63,514名)。我们的研究仅限于以下八类常见的常见,非整理肌肉骨骼条件:骨关节炎(40%,25,200,63,514),关节紊乱(0.5%,285例63,514),其他联合条件(43%,27,499 of 63,514),肌肉或韧带条件(6%,3726的63,514),骨或软骨条件(8%,5035例63,514),足部条件(63,514个),骨折(7%,4189的63,514),和扭伤或菌株(63,514的18%,11,387)。多变量的逻辑回归用于确定哪些人口统计,社会经济和健康相关因素与使用办公整个骨科服务和肌肉骨骼条件的使用差异独立相关。此外,我们在门诊系统和ED设置中每次访问的每个肌肉骨骼类别的研究期间的支出,并调整了通货膨胀。结果控制像年龄,性别,地区,保险状况,收入,教育水平和自我报告的健康状况等协变者之后,我们发现在西班牙裔患者中的门诊肌肉骨骼护理的使用显着降低了(差距0.79 [95%置信区间) 0.72至0.86]; P <0.001),非西班牙裔(或0.77 [95%CI 0.70至0.84]; P <0.001),受过较小的教育(或0.72 [95%CI 0.65至0.81]; P <0.001) ,低收入(或0.80 [95%CI 0.73至0.88]; p <0.001),非塑料保险(或0.85 [95%CI 0.79至0.91]; p <0.001)。公共保险状况(或1.30 [95%CI 1.17至1.44]; p <0.001),收入较低(或1.53 [95%CI 1.28至1.82]; P <0.001),教育状况(或1.35 [95%[95%CI) 1.14至1.60]; p = 0.001)也与ED中更多的使用肌肉骨骼护理有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号