...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >P300 Influence of rTMS with high and low frequency stimulation on motor and executive function in Parkinson’s disease. Follow-up study for half year
【24h】

P300 Influence of rTMS with high and low frequency stimulation on motor and executive function in Parkinson’s disease. Follow-up study for half year

机译:RTMS对高低频率刺激对帕金森病的高低频率刺激的影响。 半年的后续学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The non-invasive brain stimulation, like transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can influence on both cognitive and motor function of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, a protocol for daily routine is not yet been known. Furthermore, there are not known the predictors of responders or not responders to rTMS treatment. Our main goal was to select the optimal frequency with low intensity for improving executive and motor function in PD. Furthermore, we clarified the importance of age. Three groups of patients with PD were compared with each other and healthy controls in the mental tests. The 1 Hz ( N = 28), 5 Hz ( N = 13) and 5 + 1 Hz ( N = 19) frequency with low intensity was applied daily over both dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC) and over the brain stem for 7 days. Patients were followed for six months after the treatment with rTMS. The participants were divided into two groups according to their age (? 65 years and 65 years ). The patients were tested with UPDRS, walking for 6 min, 10 m walk, Trail Making Test, and dual tasks. Only the 1 Hz treatment with low intensity for 7 days had an effect on the motor scores. The rTMS with 1 Hz caused significant improvement in the motor symptoms assessed by UPDRS after one month (before trial (BF) ? 65 UPDRS total score 32.0 ± 15.0 3, after 1 month: 18.1 ± 8.6 p 0.001 , 65 BF: 28.5 ± 15.8, after 1 month: 18.6 ± 10.3 p 0.05 and it was maintained for six months in the group with ? 65 yrs ( N = 10, 18.2 ± 8.8 p 0.001 ). However, in the group with 65 yrs ( N = 16) the better outcome was observed only after one month (BF: 28.5 ± 15.8, 1 month later 18.6 ± 10.3 p 0.01 , after 6 months: UPDRS total score: 20.8 ± 12.7 p = 0.06). Although, the stimulation with 5 + 1 Hz decrease scores assessed by UPDRS, but neither the stimulation with 5 Hz nor with 5 + 1 Hz with low intensity caused significant changes in PD. Results of Trail Making Test and dual tests in PD ? 65 yrs did not differ from controls (C) below 65 years. However, the executive function of patients over 65 yrs ( N = 16) were significantly worse compared to controls ( N = 15) (C: Trail B-A: 50.0 ± 25.1 s, PD: Trail B-A 65 yrs: 76.0 ± 45.1 s p 0.01 ). Six months after treatment with rTMS with 1 Hz an improvement was observed in Trail Making Test compared to onset of treatment (PD: 48.70 ± 21.4 s p 0.05 ). The dual test was deteriorated in the group over 65 years compared to age match controls. The 1 Hz stimulation did not reverse their values. (C: counting back (CB) ?3: 50.0 ± 25.9 s, 65 yrs PD CB ?3: 57 ± 21, 1 month after rTMS CB ?3: 69 ± 20, 6 months after rTMS: 60 ± 19 s; PD BF CB-7 100 ± 45 s, 1 month 102 ± 32 s, 6 months: 82 ± 23 s). Stimulation with rTMS in the group 65 yrs showed shorter effect in motor scores than in the younger age group. Patients over 65 years in PD caused a significant deterioration in the executive function compared with age matched healthy controls. It was influenced temporarily by 1 Hz low intensity stimulation. Both the low and high frequency stimulation with proper intensity may have good outcomes in neurological diseases. Patients over 65 yrs with PD may deteriorate in their executive function compared with age matched healthy controls and decreases in the therapeutic effect of rTMS on motor function. ]]>
机译:诸如经颅磁刺激(RTMS)的非侵袭性脑刺激可以对帕金森病(Pd)的认知和运动功能影响。然而,尚未知道日常例程的协议。此外,还没有知道响应者的预测因子或不响应者对RTMS治疗。我们的主要目标是选择具有低强度的最佳频率,以改善PD中的执行和电机功能。此外,我们澄清了年龄的重要性。在精神试验中均有三组PD患者和健康对照。每天用低强度的1 Hz(n = 28),5Hz(n = 13)和5 + 1 Hz(n = 19)频率在两种背侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)和脑干上施加7天。用RTMS治疗后六个月后患者。根据他们的年龄(65岁和65岁,参与者分为两组,参与者分为两组。患者用UPDRS进行测试,步行6分钟,散步10米,进行测试,以及双重任务。只有7天的低强度的1 Hz处理对电机分数有影响。具有1 Hz的RTMS引起了UPDRS评估的电机症状的显着改善(在试验之前(BF)?65 updrs总得分32.0±15.0 3,1个月:18.1±8.6 p <0.001,& 65 bf :28.5±15.8,1个月后:18.6±10.3 p& 0.05,其中在组中保持六个月(n = 10,18.2±8.8 p <0.001)。但是,在组中& 65 yrs(n = 16)仅在一个月后观察到更好的结果(bf:28.5±15.8,1个月后1月18.6±10.3 p& 0.01,updrs总分:20.8±12.7 p = 0.06 )。但是,用UPDRS评估的5 + 1 Hz的刺激减少了分数,但既不具有5赫兹的刺激也不具有5 + 1 Hz,具有低强度的显着变化。PD的路径结果和双重测试的结果65 YRS没有与65岁以下的对照(C)不同。然而,与对照(n = 15)相比,65岁以上患者(n = 16)的患者的执行功能明显差( C:TRAIL B-A:50.0±25.1 S,PD:TRAIL B-A&GT; 65 yrs:76.0±45.1 s p& 0.01)。用RTMS治疗六个月后,在迹线制作试验中观察到1 Hz的改善,与治疗开始相比(PD:48.70±21.4 s p <0.05)。与年龄匹配控制相比,在65年内,本集团的双重试验劣化。 1 Hz刺激并未逆转其值。 (C:倒计时(CB)?3:50.0±25.9 s,& 65 yrs pd cb?3:57±21,1个月在rtms cb?3:69±20,6个月后rtms:60±19 s ; PD BF CB-7 100±45 S,1个月102±32 S,6个月:82±23秒。刺激于GT中的RTMS&GT; 65 YRS在电机分数中表现出比较年龄组的较短效果。与年龄匹配的健康对照相比,PD超过65岁以上的患者导致执行功能的显着恶化。它暂时受1 Hz低强度刺激的影响。具有适当强度的低频和高频刺激都可能在神经疾病中具有良好的结果。与PD超过65岁的患者可能在其执行功能中劣化,与年龄匹配的健康对照相比,RTMS对电机功能的治疗效果降低。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号