首页> 外文OA文献 >Controlled trial on the effect of 10 days low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor signs in Parkinson´s disease
【2h】

Controlled trial on the effect of 10 days low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor signs in Parkinson´s disease

机译:十天低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对帕金森氏病运动症状影响的对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Abstract] We evaluated the effect of low-frequency rTMSon motor signs in Parkinson’s disease (PD), under a doubleblindplacebo-controlled trial design. PD patients were randomlyassigned to received either real (n 5 9) or sham (n 59) rTMS for 10 days. Each session comprises two trains of50 stimuli each delivered at 1 Hz and at 90% of daily restmotor threshold using a large circular coil over the vertex.The effect of the stimulation, delivered during the ON-period,was evaluated during both ON and OFF periods. Tests werecarried out before and after the stimulation period, and again1 week after. The effect of the stimulation was evaluatedthrough several gait variables (cadence, step amplitude, velocity,the CVstride-time, and the turn time), hand dexterity,and also the total and motor sections of the UPDRS. Onlythe total and motor section of the UPDRS and the turn timeduring gait were affected by the stimulation, the effectappearing during either ON or OFF evaluation, and mostimportantly, equally displayed in both real and sham group.The rest of the variables were not influenced. We concludethe protocol of stimulation used, different from most protocolsthat apply larger amount of stimuli, but very similar tosome previously reported to have excellent results, has notherapeutic value and should be abandoned. This contrastswith the positive reported effects using higher frequency andfocal coils. Our work also reinforces the need for sham stimulationwhen evaluating the therapeutic effect ofrTMS.
机译:[摘要]在双盲安慰剂对照试验设计下,我们评估了低频rTMS对帕金森氏病(PD)的运动征象的影响。 PD患者被随机分配接受真实(n 5 9)或假(n 59)rTMS 10天。每个疗程包括两列50个刺激的训练,每个训练以1 Hz的频率和90%的每日静息运动阈值通过顶点上的大圆形线圈传递。在接通期间传递的刺激效果在接通和断开期间进行评估。在刺激期之前和之后以及之后1周再次进行测试。通过几个步态变量(节奏,步幅,速度,CV跨步时间和转弯时间),手灵巧度以及UPDRS的总和运动部分来评估刺激的效果。仅UPDRS的整个和运动部分以及步态期间的转弯时间受刺激,在ON或OFF评估中出现的效果影响,最重要的是,在真实组和假组中均均显示,其余变量均不受影响。我们得出的结论是,所使用的刺激方案不同于大多数施加大量刺激的方案,但与先前报道的某些具有非常好的效果的方案非常相似,没有治疗价值,应放弃。这与使用较高频率和焦距线圈的积极报道相反。在评估rTMS的治疗效果时,我们的工作还增加了对假刺激的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号