首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >The effect and optimal parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

The effect and optimal parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:重复经颅磁刺激对卒中患者电机恢复的影响及最优参数:随机对照试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on limb movement recovery post-stroke and cortex excitability, to explore the optimal parameters of rTMS and suitable stroke population. Second, adverse events were also included. Data sources: The databases of PubMed, EBSCO, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Database, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Science and Technology Journals Database were searched for randomized controlled trials exploring the effects of rTMS on limb motor function recovery post-stroke before December 2018. Review methods: The effect sizes of rTMS on limb motor recovery, the effect size of rTMS stimulation parameters, and different stroke population were summarized by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the 95% confidence interval using fixed/random effect models as appropriate. Results: For the motor function assessment, 42 eligible studies involving 1168 stroke patients were identified. The summary effect size indicated that rTMS had positive effects on limb motor recovery (SMD = 0.50, P < 0.00001) and activities of daily living (SMD = 0.82, P < 0.00001), and motor-evoked potentials of the stimulated hemisphere differed according to the stimulation frequency, that is, the high-frequency group (SMD = 0.57, P = 0.0006), except the low-frequency group (SMD = -0.27, P = 0.05). No significant differences were observed among the stimulation parameter subgroups except for the sessions subgroup (P = 0.02). Only 10 included articles reported transient mild discomfort after rTMS. Conclusions: rTMS promoted the recovery of limb motor function and changed the cortex excitability. rTMS may be better for early and pure subcortical stroke patients. Regarding different stimulation parameters, the number of stimulation sessions has an impact on the effect of rTMS.
机译:目的:这种荟萃分析的主要目的是评估重复的经颅磁刺激(RTMS)对肢体运动恢复后行程和皮质兴奋性的影响,探讨RTMS和合适的中风群的最佳参数。其次,也包括不良事件。数据来源:PubMed,EBSCO,MEDLINE,Cochrane中央登记册,Cochrane中央登记册,EBM评论 - Cochrane数据库,中国国家知识基础设施和中国科学和技术期刊数据库被检测进行随机对照试验探索效果2018年12月之前肢体电机功能恢复的RTMS。审查方法:通过计算标准化平均差异(SMD)和95%的置信区间使用固定/随机效果模型适当。结果:对于电机功能评估,确定了42名涉及1168例中风患者的合格研究。摘要效果规模表明RTMS对肢体电动机恢复的阳性影响(SMD = 0.50,P <0.00001)和日常生活的活动(SMD = 0.82,P <0.00001),并且刺激半球的电动机诱发电位根据刺激频率,即高频组(SMD = 0.57,P = 0.0006),除了低频组(SMD = -0.27,P = 0.05)。除了会话子组之外,刺激参数亚组中没有观察到显着差异(P = 0.02)。只有10条文章报告了RTMS后瞬时轻度不适。结论:RTMS促进肢体电机功能的回收率,改变了皮质兴奋性。 RTMS对于早期和纯的皮下脑卒中患者可能更好。关于不同的刺激参数,刺激会话的数量对RTMS的影响产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号