首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Teaching the competencies: using objective structured clinical encounters for gastroenterology fellows.
【24h】

Teaching the competencies: using objective structured clinical encounters for gastroenterology fellows.

机译:教学能力:利用目标结构化临床遇到胃肠学主。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AIMS: Objective structured clinical encounters (OSCEs) are used widely to educate and assess the competence of medical students and residents; they generally are absent from fellowship training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Education has cited OSCEs as a best practice for assessing the 6 core competencies. This article reports on the use of an OSCE to assess the competence of second-year gastroenterology fellows in the difficult-to-assess core competencies: interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. METHODS: We developed a 4-station, faculty-observed OSCE with 4 standardized patients. Information gathering, relationship development, patient education, and counseling skills were assessed. Professionalism skills assessed included obtaining informed consent, delivering bad news, managing difficult situations, and showing interdisciplinary respect. In each station, faculty and standardized patients completed an 18- to 24-item checklist evaluating fellows' performance and provided feedback to the fellows. Nine fellows and 5 faculty from 4 gastroenterology training programs in NYC participated. RESULTS: Fellows and faculty generally highly rated the realism of the OSCE and favorably rated the OSCE for its difficulty and their overall experience. Across all cases, fellows were rated as receiving "well dones" for 56.4% of the communication items (SD, 18.3%) and for 79.1% of the professionalism items (SD, 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating OSCEs into gastroenterology fellowship training may help enhance communication skills and prepare fellows for dealing with difficult clinical situations and provides mechanisms for constructive feedback. OSCEs developed collaboratively can assist in program self-evaluation and reduce costs by sharing resources, in addition to fulfilling Accreditation Council for Graduate Education mandates.
机译:背景目的:客观结构化临床遭遇(欧塞斯科)广泛用于教育和评估医学生和居民的能力;他们通常没有来自团契训练。研究生教育的认证委员会引用了欧洲武器,作为评估6个核心竞争力的最佳做法。本文报告了欧安组织的使用,以评估难以评估的核心竞争力:人际和沟通技巧和专业性。方法:我们开发了一个4站的师观察欧安组织,具有4名标准化患者。评估信息收集,关系发展,患者教育和咨询技能。专业技能评估包括获取知情同意,提供坏消息,管理困难情况,并显示跨学科尊重。在每个车站,教师和标准化的患者完成了18至24项清单评估研究员的表现,并为研究员提供反馈。 NYC参加的4个胃肠学培训计划的九位研究员和5个教师。结果:研究员和教师一般高度评价了欧安组织的现实主义,有利地评定了欧安组织的难度及其整体经验。在所有情况下,研究员被评为56.4%的通信项目(SD,18.3%)和79.1%的专业项目(SD,16.4%)。结论:将OSCES融入胃肠学奖学金培训可能有助于提高沟通技巧,并为处理困难的临床情况做好研究员,并为建设性反馈提供机制。除了履行研究生教育授权的认证委员会之外,欧索斯开发协作可以协助计划自我评估和降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号