首页> 外文期刊>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association >Teaching the competencies: using objective structured clinical encounters for gastroenterology fellows.
【24h】

Teaching the competencies: using objective structured clinical encounters for gastroenterology fellows.

机译:教授能力:为胃肠病学专家使用客观的结构化临床交流机会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AIMS: Objective structured clinical encounters (OSCEs) are used widely to educate and assess the competence of medical students and residents; they generally are absent from fellowship training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Education has cited OSCEs as a best practice for assessing the 6 core competencies. This article reports on the use of an OSCE to assess the competence of second-year gastroenterology fellows in the difficult-to-assess core competencies: interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. METHODS: We developed a 4-station, faculty-observed OSCE with 4 standardized patients. Information gathering, relationship development, patient education, and counseling skills were assessed. Professionalism skills assessed included obtaining informed consent, delivering bad news, managing difficult situations, and showing interdisciplinary respect. In each station, faculty and standardized patients completed an 18- to 24-item checklist evaluating fellows' performance and provided feedback to the fellows. Nine fellows and 5 faculty from 4 gastroenterology training programs in NYC participated. RESULTS: Fellows and faculty generally highly rated the realism of the OSCE and favorably rated the OSCE for its difficulty and their overall experience. Across all cases, fellows were rated as receiving "well dones" for 56.4% of the communication items (SD, 18.3%) and for 79.1% of the professionalism items (SD, 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating OSCEs into gastroenterology fellowship training may help enhance communication skills and prepare fellows for dealing with difficult clinical situations and provides mechanisms for constructive feedback. OSCEs developed collaboratively can assist in program self-evaluation and reduce costs by sharing resources, in addition to fulfilling Accreditation Council for Graduate Education mandates.
机译:背景技术目的:客观的结构化临床交流(OSCE)被广泛用于教育和评估医学生和居民的能力。他们通常不参加研究金培训。研究生教育认证委员会已将OSCE视为评估6种核心能力的最佳实践。本文报道了使用欧安组织(OSCE)评估二年制肠胃科医师在难以评估的核心能力中的能力:人际交往和沟通技巧以及专业水平。方法:我们开发了由4名标准化患者组成的4站,经教师观察的OSCE。评估了信息收集,关系发展,患者教育和咨询技巧。评估的专业技能包括获得知情同意,传递坏消息,处理困难情况以及表现出跨学科的尊重。在每个站点中,教职员工和标准化患者填写了一份18至24项检查表,以评估同伴的表现并向同伴提供反馈。来自纽约市4个胃肠病学培训计划的9名研究员和5名教职员工参加了会议。结果:研究人员和教职人员普遍对欧安组织的现实性给予了高度评价,并因其困难和整体经验而对欧安组织给予了积极评价。在所有情况下,研究人员对交流项目的56.4%(标准差,18.3%)和专业项目的79.1%(标准差,16.4%)被评为“出色”。结论:将OSCEs纳入胃肠病学研究金培训可能有助于提高沟通技巧,并为研究结实的临床情况做好准备,并提供建设性反馈机制。协作开发的OSCE除了可以满足研究生教育认证委员会的职责外,还可以通过共享资源来帮助计划自我评估并降低成本。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号