...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine >Investigation of the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey in Collegiate Athletes
【24h】

Investigation of the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey in Collegiate Athletes

机译:大学生运动员罗森鲍姆脑震荡知识与态度调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey (RoCKAS) is an appropriate outcome measure to assess knowledge and attitudes toward concussion in collegiate student-athletes as determined through validity and reliability testing. Study Design: Convenience study. Setting: The researcher recruited all athletic teams at a Division III National Collegiate Athletic Association institution. Participants: Four hundred thirty-three collegiate student-athletes, 18 years of age or older, from a variety of sports took part in this study. As the validity of RoCKAS has never been established for the target population, this study randomly split respondents into 2 studies. Interventions: Participants in this study completed the RoCKAS during preseason meetings before concussion education. The primary researcher was not present during the completion of the survey to allow participants to answer honestly without concern of coercion. Main Outcome Measures: A paper-based Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey. Results: The Concussion Knowledge Index (CKI) was distributed in 2 cluster constructs and identified variables of low and high difficulty. Multivariate statistical analysis of the Concussion Attitude Index (CAI) explains 68.79% of the total variance. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis did not confirm the hypothesis that similar constructs can be found between data sets (x_(49)~2 = 207.902; consistent akaike information criterion = 391.550; root mean square error of approximation = 0.125, and goodness of fit index = 0.868). Conclusions: The CKI is a valid and reliable measure in collegiate student-athletes. However, the results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated a poor model fit and improper correlations between attitude items. Therefore, the CAI may not be a sound outcome measure of collegiate student- athlete's attitudes toward concussions.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定Rosenbaum脑震荡知识和态度调查(Rockas)是一种适当的结果措施,以评估通过有效性和可靠性测试确定的高级学生运动员对大学生学生运动员脑震荡的适当结果措施。研究设计:便利学习。环境:研究人员招募了III司国家大学运动会机构的所有运动队。参与者:四百三十三名学院学生运动员,18岁或以上,来自各种运动参与了这项研究。由于ROCKAS的有效性从未为目标人群建立,这项研究将受访者随机分为2项研究。干预措施:本研究的参与者在呼出教育面前的经常审议会议期间完成了Rockas。在调查完成期间,初级研究员不存在,以允许参与者诚实地回答,而不担心胁迫。主要观点措施:基于纸质的罗森巴群脑震荡知识和态度调查。结果:震荡知识索引(CKI)分布在2个集群结构中,并确定了低难度和高难度的变量。对震荡态度指数(CAI)的多变量统计分析解释了总方差的68.79%。确认因子分析未确认类似构建体可以在数据集之间找到的假设(X_(49)〜2 = 207.902;一致的Akaike信息标准= 391.550;近似的均均方误差= 0.125,以及Fit Index的良好率= 0.868)。结论:CKI是大学生 - 运动员的有效和可靠的措施。然而,确认因子分析的结果表明了态度物品之间的模型良好和不当相关性。因此,CAI可能不是大学生学生 - 运动员对脑震荡态度的声音结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号