首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Processing >Is it Too Good to Be True? Question the validity of vendor claims that tout extraordinary energy efficiency
【24h】

Is it Too Good to Be True? Question the validity of vendor claims that tout extraordinary energy efficiency

机译:是真的太好了吗? 质疑供应商声称的有效性,涉足非凡的能源效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OF ALL my consulting assignments,none has been so strange as”The Case of the Magic Burner.”My client asked me to evaluate this new technology,with the objective of upgrading some boilers.The vendor claims were interesting,to say the least.The burner requires virtually no excess air,and produces essentially no carbon monoxide or NO.Furthermore,because of high flame speed,it delivers excellent heat transfer.However,what really caught my attention was the claim that the burner would reduce fuel use in the boilers by 30-40%.The name-plate efficiency of the boilers was over 90%(lower heating value(LHV)),equivalent to about 81%(higher heating value(HHV)).If the burners could reduce the fuel use by even 30%,while still delivering the same amount of useful heat,the energy efficiency would significantly exceed 100%,thus violating the first law of thermodynamics(conservation of energy).
机译:在我所有的咨询任务中,没有人奇怪是“魔术燃烧器的案例”。我的客户要求我评估这项新技术,目的是升级一些锅炉。供应商声称最有趣,可以说是有趣。 燃烧器几乎不需要过量的空气,并且产生基本上没有一氧化碳或0号,因为高火焰速度,它提供了出色的热转印。然而,如果燃烧器会降低燃料会降低燃料使用 锅炉30-40%。锅炉的铭牌效率超过90%(较低的加热值(LHV)),相当于约81%(更高的加热值(HHV))。如果燃烧器可以减少燃料使用 甚至30%,虽然仍然提供相同数量的有用热量,能量效率将显着超过100%,从而违反了热力学的第一定律(能量保护)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号