首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie >Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal villous tumours: Can we rely solely on preoperative biopsies and the surgeon's experience?
【24h】

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal villous tumours: Can we rely solely on preoperative biopsies and the surgeon's experience?

机译:直肠绒毛肿瘤的常规内窥镜显微外科:我们可以完全依赖于术前活组织检查和外科医生的经验吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has become the standard of treatment for rectal villous adenomas. However, the role of preoperative imaging for these lesions is not clear. The aim of this study was to compare the value of preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with rectal villous adenomas having transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection. Methods We conducted a single-centre comparative retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas from 2011 to 2013. The intervention was preoperative imaging versus surgeon clinical staging. The primary outcome was the accuracy of clinical staging by preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging according to the histopathologic staging. Results A total of 146 patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas. One hundred and twelve (76.7%) of those patients had no preoperative imaging while 34 patients (23.3%) had either endorectal ultrasound (22 patients) or magnetic resonance imaging (12 patients). Surgeon staging was accurate in 89.3% of cases whereas staging by endorectal ultrasound was accurate in 40.9% cases and magnetic resonance imaging was accurate in 0% of cases. In the imaging group, inaccurate staging would have led to unnecessary radical surgery in 44.0% of patients. Conclusion This study was subject to selection bias because of its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients with imaging. Patients with rectal villous tumours without invasive carcinoma on biopsies and without malignant characteristics on appearance in the judgment of an experienced colorectal surgeon might not benefit from preoperative imaging before undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures.
机译:背景技术常规内窥镜显微外科已成为直肠绒毛腺瘤的治疗标准。然而,术前成像对这些病变的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较术前成像和外科医生临床分期在术前评估直肠内镜显微外科切除术术前评估。方法采用2011至2013年对直肠绒毛腺瘤进行正常内镜显微外科手术的单中心比较回顾性研究。干预是术前成像与外科医生临床分期。主要结果是根据组织病理学分期通过术前成像和外科医生临床分期的临床分期的准确性。结果总共146名患者接受了正常内镜显微外科手术的直肠绒毛腺瘤。一百十二(76.7%)这些患者没有术前成像,而34名患者(23.3%)具有胸腔内超声(22例)或磁共振成像(12名患者)。 89.3%的病例中的外科医生分期是准确的,而尾声超声的分期在40.9%的情况下准确,磁共振成像在0%的病例中准确。在成像组中,在44.0%的患者中,不准确的分期将导致不必要的自由基手术。结论本研究受其选择偏见,因为其回顾性和成像患者有限数量的患者。直肠绒毛肿瘤没有侵入性癌的活组织检查且没有恶性特征在出现经验丰富的结肠切片外科医生的判断中可能无法从术前成像之前受益于经常内窥镜显微外科手术前。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号