...
首页> 外文期刊>Child neuropsychology: a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence >Concordance of teacher-rated and performance-based measures of executive functioning in preschoolers
【24h】

Concordance of teacher-rated and performance-based measures of executive functioning in preschoolers

机译:学龄前儿童职位评级和基于绩效的绩效措施的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The most common method used to evaluate child behavior and functioning is rating scales completed by parents and/or teachers. Given that executive functioning (EF) plays a fundamental role in the developing child’s cognitive, behavioral, and social-emotional development, it would be ideal if ratings of EF and performancebased EF measures assess the same construct. However, most studies report a small to negligible association between performance-based measures and ratings of EF. There are few studies investigating this association for preschoolers, and most only include parent ratings. Teachers may be more reliable reporters of EF behaviors due to the higher demand for EF skills in the preschool setting than at home and because teachers may have a better sense of what behaviors are normative. In this study, we reviewed the associations between three EF rating scales completed by teachers on 243 preschool children. Results showed small to moderate correlations with EF measures of inhibition and cognitive flexibility/switching for all three scales, with the strongest associations observed between Child Behavior Rating Scale (CBRS) Behavioral Regulation subscale and child EF measures. Exploratory multivariate path analyses showed that, after controlling for age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES), Behavioral Regulation significantly predicted performance-based measures of EF and accounted for incrementally more variance in the models. We conclude that in ideal situations, it is best to measure EF using both rating scales and performance-based measures of EF. The CBRS seems to be a sensitive measure of EF in preschoolers and may be a helpful brief screening tool for use with teachers.
机译:用于评估子行为和运作的最常见的方法是父母和/或教师完成的评级尺度。鉴于执行运作(EF)在发展儿童的认知,行为和社交情绪发展中起着基本作用,如果EF和绩效的EF措施评估评估相同的构建,这将是理想的。然而,大多数研究报告了基于绩效的措施与EF评级之间的可忽略不计的关联。很少有研究调查该学龄前儿童的关联,并且大多数只包括父评级。教师可能更可靠的EF行为记者,因为学前费用的EF技能更高,而不是在家中,因为教师可能有更好的观点是规范的行为。在这项研究中,我们审查了243名学龄前儿童教师完成的三个EF评级尺度之间的协会。结果表明,与所有三个尺度的抑制和认知灵活性/切换的措施中等的相关性,在儿童行为评级规模(CBRS)行为调节子级和儿童EF措施之间观察到的最强的关联。探索性多元路径分析表明,在控制年龄,性别和社会经济地位(SES)后,行为调节显着预测了基于绩效的EF措施,并占模型中的逐步更大方差。我们得出结论,在理想情况下,最好使用评级尺度和基于性能的EF措施来测量EF。 CBRS似乎是学龄前儿童EF的敏感措施,可能是与教师一起使用的有用简短的筛选工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号