...
首页> 外文期刊>Biofuels, bioproducts & biorefining: Biofpr >Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I
【24h】

Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I

机译:通过常规(脂质/脂肪酸)和先进(生物质)途径逐入生物燃料生产。 第I部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drop-in biofuels that are functionally identical to petroleum fuels and fully compatible with existing infrastructure' are needed for sectors such as aviation where biofuels such as bioethanol/biodiesel cannot be used. The technologies used to produce drop-in biofuels can be grouped into the four categories: oleochemical, thermochemical, biochemical, and hybrid technologies. Commercial volumes of conventional drop-in biofuels are currently produced through the oleochemical pathway, to make products such as renewable diesel and biojet fuel. However, the cost, sustainability, and availability of the lipid/fatty acid feedstocks are significant challenges that need to be addressed. In the longer-term, it is likely that commercial growth in drop-in biofuels will be based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. However, these technologies have been slow to develop and have been hampered by several technoeconomic challenges. For example, the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis route suffers from high capital costs and economies of scale difficulties, while the economical production of high quality syngas remains a significant challenge. Although pyrolysis/hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) based technologies are promising, the upgrading of pyrolysis oils to higher specification fuels has encountered several technical challenges, such as high catalyst cost and short catalyst lifespan. Biochemical routes to drop-in fuels have the advantage of producing single molecules with simple chemistry. However, the high value of these molecules in other markets such as renewable chemical precursors and fragrances will limit their use for fuel. In the near-term, (1-5 years) it is likely that, conventional' drop-in biofuels will be produced predominantly via the oleochemical route, due to the relative simplicity and maturity of this pathway. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
机译:在功能上与石油燃料和与现有基础设施完全兼容的生物燃料的掉落生物燃料是因为不能使用生物燃料如生物燃料/生物柴油的航空等扇区。用于生产中液燃料的技术可以分为四类:油化学,热化学,生物化学和混合技术。目前通过油化学途径产生了常规常规液质燃料的商业体积,以制造可再生柴油和生物喷头燃料等产品。然而,脂质/脂肪酸原料的成本,可持续性和可用性是需要解决的重大挑战。在长期来看,可以基于木质纤维素原料的进入生物燃料中的商业增长。然而,这些技术的发展缓慢,并受到几种技术经济挑战的阻碍。例如,气化/费舍托(FT)合成途径遭受高资本成本和规模困难的经济,而高质量合成气的经济生产仍然是一个重大挑战。尽管基于热解/水热液化(HTL)技术很有前途,但是热解油的升级为更高的规格燃料已经遇到了几种技术挑战,例如高催化剂成本和催化剂寿命。生化燃料的生物化学途径具有生产单一分子的优势,具有简单的化学。然而,其他市场中这些分子的高价值,例如可再生化学品前体和香料将限制它们对燃料的用途。在近期(1-5岁)中,由于该途径的相对简单性和成熟度,常规的“滴生物燃料”将主要通过油烟化路线生产。 (c)2017化学工业协会和约翰瓦利和儿子有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号