首页> 外文期刊>BioSocieties >Ethic of consensibility, subaltern ethicality: The clinical application of embryonic stem cells in India
【24h】

Ethic of consensibility, subaltern ethicality: The clinical application of embryonic stem cells in India

机译:伦理道德,次伦理道德:印度胚胎干细胞的临床应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article interrogates clinical and subjective patient experiences outside the institutionalized conditions of scientific communication. Drawing on the notion of consensibility -consensual and circumscribed rules of scientific engagement - the article re-imagines ethicality on the margins of an ethic of consensibility as inherently subaltern. The article is based on a multi-sited ethnography focused on a small clinical facility in India offering human embryonic stem cell (hESC) therapies for a spectrum of disorders to local and global patients. The emergence of subaltern ethicality, the article argues, is intimately linked to 'somatic ethics' in the event that a somatic ethical stance is operationalized outside the consensible space of science. The article draws on interview material with the clinical director and therapeutic experiences of patients from Germany, United States and Australia undergoing hESC therapy for chronic spinal cord injuries and lyme disease. In so doing, the article shows how subaltern ethicality is an ironic, critical stance pitted against demands for (bio)scientific and (bio)ethical consensibility while seeking to become incorporated and normalized within its folds.
机译:本文探讨了科学交流的制度化条件之外的临床和主观患者经验。文章基于意识的概念(科学参与的约定和限制规则),在作为固有的次要替代品的道德伦理的边缘重新构想了道德。这篇文章基于多地点人种志,着重于印度的一家小型临床机构,该机构为本地和全球患者提供一系列人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)治疗。文章认为,如果在科学的合理空间之外实施了躯体伦理立场,则次要伦理的出现与“躯体伦理”密切相关。本文利用来自临床主管的访谈材料以及来自德国,美国和澳大利亚的接受hESC治疗慢性脊髓损伤和莱姆病的患者的治疗经验。通过这样做,本文显示了次要伦理是一种讽刺的,批判性的立场,与对(生物)科学和(生物)伦理敏感性的要求相抵触,同时力求使其整合并规范化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号