首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >Dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy after transaortic valve replacement: Meta-analysis
【24h】

Dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy after transaortic valve replacement: Meta-analysis

机译:双抗血小板治疗与单一抗血小板治疗矫正瓣膜置换术后:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The current guidelines recommend empirical therapy with DAPT of aspirin and clopidogrel for six months after TAVR. This recommendation is based on expert consensus only. Giving the lack of clear consensus on treatment strategy following TAVR. Goal of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and Materials: We performed a meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective studies that tested DAPT vs. MAPT for all-cause mortality and major bleeding of 603 patients. The primary efficacy outcomes were 30 days mortality and stroke. The primary safety outcomes were major bleeding and major vascular complications. Results: We included 603 patients from 4 studies. The use of MAPT was associated with similar mortality rate (5.9% vs. 6.6%; RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.49-1.71; P = 0.68) and stroke rate compared with DAPT (1.3% vs. 1.3%; RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.27 to 4.04; P = 0.81). There was no difference in major vascular complication (4.2% vs. 8.9%; RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.18; P = 0.17) or minor vascular complication (4.2% vs. 7.3%; RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.34; P = 0.14). However, MAPT was associated with significantly less risk of major bleeding (4.9% vs. 14.5%; RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.70; P< 0.01) but no difference in minor bleeding (4.2% vs. 3.6%; RR 1.16; 95% CI 0.43 to 3.10; P= 0.85). Conclusion: MAPT use after TAVR is associated with lower rates of major bleeding compared with DAPT with no significant difference in mortality, stroke or vascular complications.
机译:背景:目前的指导方针建议在TAVR后六个月的阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的实证治疗。本建议书仅基于专家共识。在TAVR之后缺乏对治疗战略的明确共识。该荟萃分析的目标是评估单抗血小板治疗(MAPT)与双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的疗效和安全性,后者在经沟管主动脉瓣膜置换(TAVR)。方法和材料:我们对随机临床试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以及测试DAPT与MAPT的前瞻性研究,用于MAPT的全因死亡率和603名患者的重大出血。主要疗效结果为30天死亡率和中风。主要的安全结果是主要出血和主要的血管并发症。结果:我们包括4名研究的603名患者。 MAPT的使用与类似的死亡率(5.9%与6.6%; RR = 0.92; 95%CI 0.49-1.71; p = 0.68)和卒中率与DAPT(1.3%与1.3%; RR 1.04; 95%CI 0.27至4.04; p = 0.81)。主要的血管并发症没有差异(4.2%vs.8.9%; RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.23至1.18; p = 0.17)或少量血管并发症(4.2%与7.3%; RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.25 1.34; p = 0.14)。然而,MAPT与主要出血的风险显着较低(4.9%与14.5%; RR 0.37; 95%CI 0.20至0.70; P <0.01),但轻微出血没有差异(4.2%与3.6%; RR 1.16 ; 95%CI 0.43至3.10; p = 0.85)。结论:与死亡率,中风或血管并发症无显着差异,TAVR后的MAPT使用与重大出血的较低率相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号