首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >Evaluation of lesion flow coefficient for the detection of coronary artery disease in patient groups from two academic medical centers
【24h】

Evaluation of lesion flow coefficient for the detection of coronary artery disease in patient groups from two academic medical centers

机译:两种学术医疗中心患者患者患者冠状动脉疾病的病变流量系数评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundIn this study, lesion flow coefficient (LFC: ratio of % area stenosis [%AS] to the square root of the ratio of the pressure drop across the stenosis to the dynamic pressure in the throat region), that combines both the anatomical (%AS) and functional measurements (pressure and flow), was assessed for application in a clinical setting. Methods and resultsPressure, flow, and anatomical values were obtained from patients in 251 vessels from two different centers. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), Coronary flow reserve (CFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance index (HSR) and hyperemic microvascular index (HMR) were calculated. Anatomical data was corrected for the presence of guidewire and the LFC values were calculated. LFC was correlated with FFR, CFR, HSR, HMR, individually and in combination with %AS. The p<0.05 was used for statistical significance.LFC correlated significantly when the FFR (pressure-based), CFR (flow-based), and anatomical measure %AS were combined (r=0.64; p<0.05). Similarly, LFC correlated significantly when HSR, HMR, and %AS were combined (r=0.72; p<0.05). LFC was able to significantly (p<0.05) distinguish between the two concordant and the two discordant groups of FFR and CFR, corresponding to the clinically used cut-off values (FFR=0.80 and CFR=2.0). The LFC could also significantly (p<0.05) distinguish between the normal and abnormal microvasculature conditions in the presence of non-significant epicardial stenosis, while the comparison was borderline significant (p=0.09) in the presence of significant stenosis. ConclusionLFC, a parameter that combines both the anatomical and functional end-points, has the potential for application in a clinical setting for CAD evaluation.
机译:背景技术,病变流量系数(LFC:%面积狭窄的比例[%AS]到喉部区域中狭窄的压力下降的压力下降的平方根),其结合了解剖学(% AS)和功能测量(压力和流动)被评估在临床环境中的应用。方法和结果,流量和解剖值是从两种不同中心的251个血管中的患者获得的。计算分数流量储备(FFR),冠状动脉流量储备(CFR),过度狭窄抗性指数(HSR)和血液血管指数(HMR)。针对导丝的存在校正解剖数据,并计算LFC值。 LFC与FFR,CFR,HSR,HMR,单独和与%相结合相关。 P <0.05用于统计学显着性。当组合的FFR(基于压力),CFR(流动型)和解剖学措施%相比(R = 0.64; P <0.05)时,P <0.05显着相关。类似地,当合并的HSR,HMR和%时,LFC显着相关(R = 0.72; P <0.05)。 LFC能够显着(P <0.05)区分两种协调剂和两个不合适的FFR和CFR组,对应于临床使用的截止值(FFR = 0.80和CFR = 2.0)。 LFC也可以显着(p <0.05)区分在非显着外膜狭窄存在下的正常和异常的微血管条件之间,而在存在显着狭窄的情况下,比较是临界显着的(p = 0.09)。结论LFC,结合解剖学和功能终点的参数,具有在CAD评估的临床环境中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号