...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebral cortex >Shared and Disorder-Specific Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Decision-Making in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
【24h】

Shared and Disorder-Specific Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Decision-Making in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

机译:自闭症谱系障碍和强迫性疾病中决策的共享和紊乱特异性神经检查机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) often share phenotypes of repetitive behaviors, possibly underpinned by abnormal decision-making. To compare neural correlates underlying decision-making between these disorders, brain activation of boys with ASD (N = 24), OCD (N = 20) and typically developing controls (N = 20) during gambling was compared, and computational modeling compared performance. Patients were unimpaired on number of risky decisions, but modeling showed that both patient groups had lower choice consistency and relied less on reinforcement learning compared to controls. ASD individuals had disorder-specific choice perseverance abnormalities compared to OCD individuals. Neurofunctionally, ASD and OCD boys shared dorsolateral/inferior frontal underactivation compared to controls during decision- making. During outcome anticipation, patients shared underactivation compared to controls in lateral inferior/orbitofrontal cortex and ventral striatum. During reward receipt, ASD boys had disorder-specific enhanced activation in inferior frontal/insular regions relative to OCD boys and controls. Results showed that ASD and OCD individuals shared decision-making strategies that differed fromcontrols to achieve comparable performance to controls. Patients showed shared abnormalities in lateral-(orbito) fronto-striatal reward circuitry, but ASD boys had disorder-specific lateral inferior frontal/insular overactivation, suggesting that shared and disorder-specific mechanisms underpin decision-making in these disorders. Findings provide evidence for shared neurobiological substrates that could serve as possible future biomarkers.
机译:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和强迫性疾病(OCD)经常共享重复行为的表型,可能是通过异常决策的基础。为了比较这些疾病之间的潜在决策的潜在决策,比较了与ASD(n = 24),OCD(n = 20)的男孩的脑激活,并且在赌博期间,在赌博期间的脑部激活(n = 20),并且计算建模的性能。患者在危险决策的数量上未受损,但建模表明,与对照相比,两名患者群体的选择一致性较低,依赖于加固学习。与OCD个体相比,ASD个体具有特异性特异性选择持续性异常。与决策期间的控制相比,神经功能性,ASD和OCD男孩共用背面层/较差的额外损活。在成果预期期间,与侧面次劣质/眶内皮质皮层和腹侧纹状体的对照相比,患者共同发生。在奖励收据期间,Asd Boys在相对于OCD男孩和控制器中的劣质前部/蒙特地区具有紊乱的增强激活。结果表明,ASD和OCD个人共享与控制不同的决策策略,以实现对控制的可比性。患者在横向 - (奥贝罗)横向奖励电路中显示出共同的异常,但ASD男孩具有特异性特异性横向较差的前部/蒙特过度激活,表明分享和障碍特异性机制在这些疾病中的决策下进行决策。调查结果为可作为可能的未来生物标志物提供的共享神经生物学基质提供证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号