首页> 外文期刊>Current Psychology >Incremental Validity of Components of Mindfulnessin the Prediction of Satisfaction with Life and Depression
【24h】

Incremental Validity of Components of Mindfulnessin the Prediction of Satisfaction with Life and Depression

机译:正念组成部分在生活和抑郁感满意度预测中的递增效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Self-report measures of mindfulness have consistently demonstratedpositive relationships with well-being and inverse relationships with depressionsymptoms. The goal of this study was to extend the existing literature to include atest of the incremental validity of the components of mindfulness (as measured bythe four factors of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills [KIMS]; Baer et al.Assessment, 11, 191-206, 2004) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale(MAAS; Brown and Ryan Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848, 2003) in the prediction of satisfaction with life (relative to self-esteem) anddepression (relative to negative cognitions) among a sample of 365 college students.Results revealed only KIMS Observe accounted for a significant amount variancerelative to self-esteem in the prediction of satisfaction with life, and in the predictionof depression symptoms, only KIMS Accept without Judgment accounted for asignificant amount of variance relative to negative cognitions. These results arediscussed in relation to the measurement of mindfulness and methods used to assessthe validity of these scales.
机译:正念的自我报告测度一直显示与幸福感呈正相关,与抑郁症状呈反比关系。这项研究的目的是扩展现有文献,以包括对正念组成部分增量有效性的检验(通过肯塔基州正念技能清单[KIMS]的四个因素来衡量; Baer等人,评估,11,191- 206(2004)和正念注意意识量表(MAAS; Brown and Ryan Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,822-848,2003)预测生活满意度(相对于自尊)和抑郁(相对于负面365名大学生样本中的认知)。结果显示,只有KIMS观察者在预测生活满意度时与自尊有显着差异,而在抑郁症症状的预测中,只有KIMS接受而无需判断才占显着水平。相对于负面认知的差异。讨论这些结果与正念的量度和用于评估这些量表的有效性的方法有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号