首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparison of Acute Expansion of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Drug-Eluting Stents in Different Degrees of Calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study
【24h】

Comparison of Acute Expansion of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Drug-Eluting Stents in Different Degrees of Calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study

机译:生物血管支架急性膨胀对不同程度钙化中金属药物洗脱支架的急性扩张:光学相干断层扫描研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in lesions with different extent of calcification was compared by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Background: The acute mechanical performance of polymeric BRS in calcified lesions is poorly understood. Methods: Acute device performance in lesions treated with either BRS(N=50) or DES (N=50) was compared using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). According to angiographic degree of calcification the lesions were divided in three groups: no/mild, moderate and heavy calcification. Device performance was assessed with the following parameters by OCT: mean scaffold area, eccentricity index (EI), symmetry index (SI) and percentage incomplete strut apposition (ISA). Results: One hundred lesions from 85 patients (BRS/DES; 37/48) were analyzed. Scaffold area and SI were similar between BRS and DES groups in the three calcification subgroups. Compared to DES, EI in BRS was marginally lower in the no/mild calcification group (0.860.03 versus 0.88 +/- 0.03, p=0.018) but was similar in the moderate and heavy calcification groups. Compared to DES, percentage ISA struts in BRS was similar in the no/mild calcification group and was significantly lower in the moderate and heavy calcification groups (2.96 +/- 2.36 versus 6.78 +/- 4.61%, p=0.002 and 1.82 +/- 2.40 versus 8.89 +/- 8.25%, p=0.025 respectively). Conclusions: With adequate lesion preparation, implantation of BRS in a population reflective of clinical practice, resulted in a similar luminal gain compared to DES as measured by OCT, regardless of the degree of angiographic calcification, while acute malapposition is lower with BRS in moderately and heavily calcified lesions. The clinical significance of our findings warrants further evaluation in future studies. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的:通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)比较了具有不同钙化程度的病变中生物吸收血管支架(BRS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)的急性扩张。背景:钙化病变中聚合物BRS的急性力学性能较差。方法:使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)比较用BRS(n = 50)或DES(n = 50)处理的病变中的急性装置性能。根据血管造影程度的钙化程度,病变分为三组:NO / MILD,中度和钙化。通过OCT通过以下参数评估设备性能:平均脚手架区域,偏心指数(EI),对称性指数(SI)和不完全支撑位(ISA)的百分比。结果:分析了85名患者(BRS / DES; 37/48)的一百个病灶。在三个钙化亚组中的BRS和DES组之间的脚手架区域和Si类似。与DES相比,BRS中的EI在NO / MILD钙化组中略微低下(0.860.03与0.88 +/- 0.03,P = 0.018),但在中等和重型钙化组中类似。与DES相比,BRS中的百分比在NO / MILD钙化基团中类似,中度和重度钙化组显着降低(2.96 +/- 2.36与6.78 +/- 4.61%,P = 0.002和1.82 + / - 2.40与8.89 +/- 8.25%,p = 0.025)。结论:具有足够的病变制剂,在临床实践中的一种人口中植入BRS,导致与OCT测量的DES相比类似的腔内增益,无论血管造影程度如何,而急性morposition在适度和中度较低严重钙化病变。我们调查结果的临床意义认证了未来的研究进一步评估。 (c)2016 Wiley期刊,Inc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号