...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides
【24h】

A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides

机译:流行统计和机器学习方法模拟山体积体积的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study attempts to compare popular statistical methods (linear, logarithmic, quadratic, power and exponential functions) with machine learning methods (multi-layer perceptron (MLP), radial base function (RBF), adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector machine (SVM)) for simulating the volume of landslides based on their surface area (VL~AL) in the Kurdistan province, Iran. Performances of the models were validated using some commonly error functions including the Adjusted R2, F-test and AIC (Akaike Information Criteria). The results showed that the power model demonstrates the best performance compared to other statistical methods whereas the ANFIS model outperforms other machine learning approaches. Furthermore, the comparative results showed that machine learning methods indicate better performances than simple statistical methods for simulating the volume of landslides in the study area. In practice, the outputs of this research can help managers and investigators decrease the cost of field surveys and measurements of volumes of landslides in landslide hazard management projects. Highlights ? The simulating of landslides volume using popular statistical and machine learning ? Performance of the models was validated using Adjusted R2, F-test and AIC. ? Machine learning methods have better performance than simple statistical methods. ? The obtained results can help to decrease the cost of landslide hazard management.
机译:本研究试图使用机器学习方法(多层Perceptron(MLP),径向基础函数(RBF),自适应神经基模糊推理系统(ANFIS)进行比较流行统计方法(线性,对数,二次电源和指数函数)并支持向量机(SVM)),用于模拟基于伊朗库尔德斯坦省的地表面积(VL〜Al)的滑坡体积。使用包括调整后的R2,F-Test和AIC(Akaike信息标准)的一些常见错误功能来验证模型的性能。结果表明,与其他统计方法相比,功率模型表现出最佳性能,而ANFIS模型优于其他机器学习方法。此外,比较结果表明,机器学习方法表明比模拟研究区域中的滑坡体积的简单统计方法表明表现更好。在实践中,本研究的产出可以帮助管理人员和调查人员降低山体滑坡危险管理项目中的山体滑坡的现场调查和测量的成本。强调 ?使用流行统计和机器学习模拟山体滑坡卷?使用调整的R2,F-Test和AIC验证模型的性能。还机器学习方法具有比简单的统计方法更好的性能。还获得的结果可以有助于降低滑坡危险管理的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号