首页> 外文期刊>Cytopathology >Test characteristics of various screening modalities for cervical cancer: a feasibility study to develop an alternative strategy for resource-limited settings.
【24h】

Test characteristics of various screening modalities for cervical cancer: a feasibility study to develop an alternative strategy for resource-limited settings.

机译:宫颈癌的各种筛查方式的测试特征:为资源有限的环境开发替代策略的可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine test characteristics - sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values - of different screening modalities to detect cervical precancerous and cancerous lesions in order to devise an effective alternative strategy for cervical cancer screening in resource-poor settings. METHODS: A total of 472 women presenting with nonspecific gynecologic symptoms were screened by cytology, visual inspection with acetic acid application (VIA), VIA with magnification (VIAM) and human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing. Colposcopic examination was performed in all and on-site biopsy was taken if any grade I and above lesion was detected on colposcopy (230). On histopathological examination, 105 showed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and above lesions. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each test were calculated taking colposcopy and or directed biopsy as the gold standard. Comparisons were made with cytology in order to assess the feasibility of alternative strategies in resource-poor settings. RESULTS: VIA was less sensitive (86.7% versus 91.4%) but more specific (90.7% versus 86.6%) than cytology at low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) threshold but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.01). HPV testing improved the sensitivity over cytology (97.1% versus 91.4%) but there was a nonsignificant loss of specificity (84.2% versus 86.6%). Results of VIAM were more or less similar to VIA. CONCLUSION: VIA can be used as a mass screening tool for cervical cancer in resource-poor settings.
机译:目的:确定不同筛查方式的检测特征-敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值-以检测宫颈癌前病变和癌性病变,以便设计一种有效的替代策略,以在资源匮乏的地区进行宫颈癌筛查。方法:通过细胞学检查,乙酸检查(VIA),肉眼检查(VIAM)和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-DNA检测,共筛查了472名表现出非特异性妇科症状的妇女。阴道镜检查全部进行,如果在阴道镜检查中发现I级以上病变,则进行活检(230)。在组织病理学检查中,有105例显示宫颈上皮内瘤变II及以上病变。以阴道镜和/或定向活检为金标准,计算每个测试的灵敏度,特异性和预测值。为了评估资源贫乏地区替代策略的可行性,对细胞学进行了比较。结果:在低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)阈值下,VIA的敏感性低于细胞学(86.7%对91.4%),但特异性更高(90.7%对86.6%),但差异无统计学意义(P> 0.01)。 HPV检测相对于细胞学检查提高了敏感性(97.1%对91.4%),但特异性丧失不明显(84.2%对86.6%)。 VIAM的结果与VIA大致相似。结论:VIA可作为资源贫乏地区子宫颈癌的大规模筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号