...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer genetics >Differences between chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma cells by proteomic profiling and SNP microarray analysis
【24h】

Differences between chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma cells by proteomic profiling and SNP microarray analysis

机译:蛋白质组学分析和SNP微阵列分析慢性淋巴细胞白血病与小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤细胞的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Two potential protein markers, m/z 3091 and 8707, were identified as being able to distinguish between CLL and SLL. ? There was a significantly lower expression of leucocyte trafficking receptor CXCR3 (CD183) and migration and homing receptor CXCR4 (CD184) on SLL cells, which could explain why the SLL cells are retained in the lymph nodes and are not circulating. ? Both proteomic and microarray analyses indicate that SLL appears to be a more progressive disease than CLL with a more complex genotype. The majority of malignant cells in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) circulate in the peripheral blood whereas small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) cells reside in tissues. The aim of this study was to detect differences in chemokine receptor expression, DNA single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis and proteomic profiling to help elucidate why the cells remain in their respective environments. We identified by flow cytometric studies of chemokine receptors and DNA SNP microarray analysis significant differences between cells from CLL and SLL patients. Proteomic analysis revealed two potential markers ( m/z 3091 and 8707) to distinguish the two disorders. There was a significantly greater expression of leucocyte trafficking receptor CXCR3 (CD183) and migration and homing receptor CXCR4 (CD184), and significantly lower expression of cell adhesion molecule integrin α 4 chain (CD49d), on CLL cells, compared with SLL cells. Conversely, SNP microarrays revealed greater numbers of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity chromosomal aberrations, as well as gross chromosomal aberrations, in the SLL group, compared with the CLL group. These findings revealed that there was a significantly greater expression of trafficking, migration and homing receptors and significantly lower expression of adhesion molecules on CLL cells than on SLL cells, and that SLL may be a more progressive disease than CLL, with a more complex genotype.
机译:强调 ?鉴定出两个潜在的蛋白标记,M / Z 3091和8707能够区分CLL和SLL。还在SLL细胞上存在白细胞贩运受体CXCR3(CD183)和迁移和归巢受体CXCR4(CD184)的显着降低,这可以解释为什么SLL细胞保留在淋巴结中并没有循环。还蛋白质组学和微阵列分析都表明SLL似乎比具有更复杂的基因型的CLL更加渐进的疾病。慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中的大多数恶性细胞在外周血中循环,而小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)细胞位于组织中。本研究的目的是检测趋化因子受体表达,DNA单核苷酸多态性(SNP)微阵列分析和蛋白质组学分析的差异,以帮助阐明细胞留在各自环境中的原因。我们通过趋化因子受体的流式细胞术研究鉴定,DNA SNP微阵列分析来自CLL和SLL患者的细胞之间的显着差异。蛋白质组学分析显示出两个潜在标记物(M / Z 3091和8707),以区分两种疾病。与SLL细胞相比,对白细胞贩运受体CXCR3(CD183)和迁移和归巢受体CXCR4(CD184)的表达显着降低了CLL细胞的细胞粘附分子整合蛋白α4链(CD49D)的表达。相反,与CLL组相比,SNP微阵列揭示了杂合子染色体像差的杂合子染色体像差的复制 - 中性损失,以及总染色体畸变,与CLL组相比。这些发现显示,贩运,迁移和归巢受体的表达显着更大,并且CLL细胞上的粘附分子表达明显低于SLL细胞,并且SLL可能比CLL更加渐进的疾病,具有更复杂的基因型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号