首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Plant Science >Testing the suitability of thermal time models for forecasting spring wheat phenological development in western Canada
【24h】

Testing the suitability of thermal time models for forecasting spring wheat phenological development in western Canada

机译:在加拿大西部预测春小麦挥发性发展的热时间模型的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Predicting crop development stages is fundamental to many aspects of agronomy (e.g., pesticides and fertilizer applications). Temperature is the main factor affecting plant development and its impact on crop development is often measured using thermal-time. We compared different thermal-time models to identify the best model for simulating spring wheat development in western Canada. Models compared include (i) North-Dakota growing-degree-day (NDGDD), (ii) growing-degree-day base-temperature zero (GDD(0)), (iii) growing-degree-day base-temperature five (GDD(5)), (iv) beta-function (BF), and (v) modified-beta-function (MBF). We utilised agrometeorological data collected across western Canada from 2009-2011. Results showed that accumulated heat units/daily growth rates from the different models correlated well with spring wheat phenology with R-2 = 0.91 and P < 0.001. However, when the developed models were used to predict time (calendar-days) from planting to anthesis for cultivar AC-Barrie, the BF and MBF models performed poorly. Average predicted times from planting to anthesis by NDGDD, GDD(0), GDD(5), BF, and MBF models were 63, 63, 62, 65, and 64 d, respectively; while the actual observed time was 60 d. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) for NDGDD was 4 d, 5 d for GDD(0) and GDD(5), and 6 d for BF and MBF. These findings suggest that simple GDD-based models performed better than more complex BF-based models.
机译:预测作物发展阶段是农艺(例如农药和肥料应用)的许多方面的基础。温度是影响植物发育的主要因素,并且其对作物发展的影响通常使用热时间来测量。我们比较了不同的热时间模型,以确定加拿大西部春小麦开发的最佳模型。模型包括(i)北达科他州生长度(NDGDD),(ii)生长度日基 - 温度零(GDD(0)),(III)生长程度天基 - 温度五( GDD(5)),(IV)β-功能(BF),和(V)修饰-β-函数(MBF)。我们在2009 - 2011年,我们在加拿大西部收集了农业气象数据。结果表明,累积的热量单位/来自不同模型的日常生长率与春小麦酚合出来,R-2 = 0.91和P <0.001。然而,当开发的模型用于预测从种植到品种AC-Barri的花香机时(日历日),BF和MBF模型表现不佳。通过NDGDD,GDD(0),GDD(5),BF和MBF模型的平均预测时间分别由NDGDD,GDD(0),GDD(5),BF和MBF模型分别为63,63,62,65和64d;虽然实际观察时间为60天。用于NDGDD的根均方误差(RMSE)为GDD(0)和GDD(5)的4d,5 d,以及用于BF和MBF的6d。这些发现表明,基于GDD的简单模型比基于BF的基于BF的模型更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号