...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biometeorology >Changes in stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis during phenological development in spring wheat: implications for gas exchange modelling
【24h】

Changes in stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis during phenological development in spring wheat: implications for gas exchange modelling

机译:春季小麦物候发育过程中气孔导度和净光合作用的变化:对气体交换模型的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gas exchange was measured from 1 month before the onset of anthesis until the end of grain filling in field-grown spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L., cv. Vinjett, in southern Sweden. Two g s models were parameterised using these data: one Jarvis-type multiplicative g s model (J-model), and one combined stomatal-photosynthesis model (L-model). In addition, the multiplicative g s model parameterisation for wheat used within the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP-model) was tested and evaluated. The J-model performed well (R 2=0.77), with no systematic pattern of the residuals plotted against the driving variables. The L-model explained a larger proportion of the variation in g s data when observations of A n were used as input data (R 2=0.71) compared to when A n was modelled (R 2=0.53). In both cases there was a systematic model failure, with g s being over- and underestimated before and after anthesis, respectively. This pattern was caused by the non-parallel changes in g s and A n during plant phenological development, with A n both peaking and starting to decline earlier as compared to g s . The EMEP-model accounted for 41% of the variation in g s data, with g s being underestimated after anthesis. We conclude that, under the climatic conditions prevailing in southern Scandinavia, the performance of the combined stomatal-photosynthesis approach is hampered by the non-parallel changes in g s and A n, and that the phenology function of the EMEP-model, having a sharp local maximum at anthesis, should be replaced by a function with a broad non-limiting period after anthesis.
机译:从花期开始前的1个月到田间种植的春小麦Triticum aestivum L.,cv。的籽粒充填结束,测量气体交换。位于瑞典南部的Vinjett。使用这些数据对两个g s 模型进行了参数设置:一个Jarvis型乘法g s 模型(J模型)和一个组合的气孔光合作用模型(L模型)。此外,还对欧洲监测与评估计划(EMEP-model)中使用的小麦的乘积g s 模型参数进行了测试和评估。 J模型表现良好(R 2 = 0.77),没有针对驱动变量绘制残差的系统模式。当使用A n 的观测值作为输入数据(R 2 = 0.71)时,L模型解释了gs 数据变化的较大比例。 >被建模(R 2 = 0.53)。在这两种情况下,都存在系统性的模型故障,花前和花后g s 分别被高估和低估。这种模式是由于植物物候发育过程中gs 和A n 的非平行变化引起的,与gs 相比,A n 达到峰值和开始下降的时间更早。 。 EMEP模型占g s 数据变化的41%,而花期后g s 被低估了。我们得出的结论是,在斯堪的纳维亚半岛南部普遍的气候条件下,气孔-光合作用组合方法的性能受到gs 和A n 的非平行变化的阻碍,并且在花期后具有尖锐的局部最大值的EMEP模型应由花期后具有较宽的非限制期的函数代替。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号