首页> 外文期刊>Calcified tissue international. >Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice: A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)
【24h】

Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice: A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)

机译:日常临床实践中肌肉功能和身体表现的评估:欧洲临床和经济方面的核心症,骨关节炎和肌肉骨骼疾病(ESCEO)的临床和经济方面认可的位置纸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is well recognized that poor muscle function and poor physical performance are strong predictors of clinically relevant adverse events in older people. Given the large number of approaches to measure muscle function and physical performance, clinicians often struggle to choose a tool that is appropriate and validated for the population of older people they deal with. In this paper, an overview of different methods available and applicable in clinical settings is proposed. This paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized afterwards where the whole group could amend and discuss the recommendations further. Several characteristics should be considered when choosing a tool: (1) purpose of the assessment (intervention, screening, diagnosis); (2) patient characteristics (population, settings, functional ability, etc.); (3) psychometric properties of the tool (test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, etc.); (4) applicability of the tool in clinical settings (overall cost, time required for the examination, level of training, equipment, patient acceptance, etc.); (5) prognostic reliability for relevant clinical outcomes. Based on these criteria and the available evidence, the expert group advises the use of grip strength to measure muscle strength and the use of 4-m gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery test to measure physical performance in daily practice. The tools proposed are relevant for the assessment of muscle weakness and physical performance. Subjects with low values should receive additional diagnostic workups to achieve a full diagnosis of the underlying condition responsible (sarcopenia, frailty or other).
机译:众所周知,肌肉功能差和物理性能差是老年人临床相关不良事件的强烈预测因子。鉴于测量肌肉功能和物理性能的大量方法,临床医生常常努力选择适当的工具,并为他们处理的老年人的人口验证。本文提出了概述可用的不同方法,适用于临床环境。本文基于欧洲骨质疏松症和骨关节炎(Esceo)工作组欧洲临床和经济方面的临床和经济方面的临床和经济方面进行的文学评论。之后,整个集团可以修改并进一步讨论建议的面对面会议。选择工具时应考虑几种特点:(1)评估的目的(干预,筛查,诊断); (2)患者特征(人口,设置,功能能力等); (3)工具的心理测量性能(测试 - 重保持可靠性,帧间可靠性,响应性,楼层和天花板效果等); (4)工具在临床环境中适用(总成本,考试所需时间,培训水平,设备,患者验收等); (5)相关临床结果的预后可靠性。根据这些标准和可用证据,专家组建议使用握力量来测量肌肉力量和使用4米的步态速度或短的物理性能电池测试,以测量日常实践中的物理性能。提出的工具与评估肌肉弱点和身体表现有关。具有低值的受试者应获得额外的诊断次数,以实现负责(Sarcopenia,Frealy或其他)的潜在条件的全面诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号