...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Cost‐effectiveness of long‐acting insulin analogues vs vs intermediate/long‐acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population‐based cohort followed over 10 years
【24h】

Cost‐effectiveness of long‐acting insulin analogues vs vs intermediate/long‐acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population‐based cohort followed over 10 years

机译:长效胰岛素类似物的成本效果与1型糖尿病的中间/长效人胰岛素:基于人群的队列,随之而来10年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness of long‐acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) vs intermediate/long‐acting human insulin (ILAHI) for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in real‐world clinical practice. Methods Individual‐level analyses were conducted within a longitudinal population‐based cohort of 540 propensity score‐matched T1D patients (LAIAs, n = 270; ILAHI, n = 270) with over 10 years of follow‐up using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 2004–2013, from third‐party payer and healthcare sector perspectives. The study outcomes included the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of clinical events (eg, hypoglycaemia, diabetes‐related complications), medical costs, and cost per case of events prevented. Cost estimates are presented in 2013 British pounds (GBP, £). Results The NNTs using LAIAs vs ILAHI to avoid one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia and any diabetes‐related complications were 12, 9 and 10 for mean follow‐up periods of 5.84, 6.02 and 3.62 years, respectively. From third‐party payer and healthcare sector perspectives, using LAIAs instead of ILAHI saved GBP6924‐GBP7116 per case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance prevented, GBP5346‐GBP5508 per case of outpatient hypoglycaemia prevented, and GBP3570‐GBP3680 per case of any diabetes‐related complications prevented. Sensitivity analyses considering sampling uncertainty showed that using LAIAs over ILAHI yields at least a 76% probability of cost‐saving for avoiding one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia or any diabetes‐related complications. Conclusions This real‐world evidence reveals that compared with ILAHI, the greater pharmaceutical costs associated with LAIAs for patients with T1D could be substantially offset by savings from averted hypoglycaemia or diabetes‐related complications.
机译:目的本研究评估了长效胰岛素类似物(Laias)对现实世界临床实践中1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的中间/长效人胰岛素(Ilahi)的成本效益。方法在纵向群体群组的540型倾级匹配的T1D患者(Laias,N = 270; Ilahi,N = 270)中进行各个级别分析,使用台湾国家健康保险研究数据库有超过10年的随访,2004-2013,来自第三方付款人和医疗保健部门的观点。该研究结果包括治疗(NNT)所需的数量,以防止一个临床事件(例如,低血糖,糖尿病相关并发症),医疗费用和每种事件的成本阻止。成本估计在2013年英镑(GBP,£)上呈现。结果使用Laias与Ilahi的NNT,以避免一个需要医疗援助的低血糖,门诊性低血糖和任何糖尿病相关的并发症,分别为5.84,6.02和3.62岁的平均随访时间为12,9和10个。从第三方付款人和医疗保健部门的角度来看,利用Laias而不是伊利拉维保存的GBP6924-GBP7116每个需要医疗援助的低血糖预防,每种外门低血症的GBP5346-GBP5508都有预防,每种情况下,每个糖尿病相关的并发症的GBP3570-GBP3680防止。考虑取样不确定性的敏感性分析表明,利莱亚斯利拉亚利亚利亚产生了至少76%的节省成本概率,以避免需要医疗援助,门诊性低血糖或任何糖尿病相关的并发症。结论这种现实世界的证据表明,与伊拉希相比,与T1D患者的Laias相关的药物成本可以显着抵消来自避免的低血糖或糖尿病相关的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号