首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Use of oral antidiabetic agents and risk of community‐acquired pneumonia: a nested case–control study
【24h】

Use of oral antidiabetic agents and risk of community‐acquired pneumonia: a nested case–control study

机译:使用口腔抗糖尿病药物和患有社区肺炎的风险:嵌套案例对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims To evaluate the association between use of different oral antidiabetic agents (OAD) and the risk of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with type‐2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods Case–control study nested in a cohort of patients with T2DM and use of OAD between 2002 and 2013, based in a Spanish general practice research database. Cases were people diagnosed with T2DM, aged 18 years and with a validated diagnosis of CAP between 2002 and 2013. Ten controls were matched on age, sex and calendar year. Odds ratio (OR) of CAP was estimated comparing patients treated with: (1) metformin vs. other monotherapies or no antidiabetic treatment; (2) metformin + sulfonylureas vs. other antidiabetic combinations. OR of CAP was also assessed according to antidiabetic treatment duration. Results From a cohort of 76?009 T2DM patients, we identified 1803 cases of CAP. No difference in the incidence of CAP was observed when comparing any OAD in monotherapy with metformin. Compared with current use of metformin + sulfonylurea, thiazolidinediones + metformin was associated with an increased risk of CAP (adjusted OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.40–4.38). The use of any combination with thiazolidinediones was also associated with higher risk of CAP (adjusted OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.22–3.28). Current use of DPP‐4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of CAP. Conclusions No differences in the incidence of CAP were observed between the use of OAD in monotherapy vs. metformin. Thiazolidinedione use in combination was associated with an increase in the risk of CAP when compared to metformin + sulfonylureas. The use of DPP‐4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of CAP.
机译:旨在评估不同口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)的使用与2型糖尿病患者(T2DM)的患者患者的社区获得的肺炎(帽)的风险。方法案例对照研究嵌套在T2DM患者队列中,并在2002年至2013年期间,基于西班牙一般实践研究数据库。病例是诊断出T2DM的人,年龄效率为18岁,并在2002年至2013年之间进行了验证的诊断。十个对照年龄,性别和日历年匹配。估计概率(或)概率估计对待:(1)二甲双胍与其他单一疗法或未抗糖尿病治疗; (2)二甲双胍+磺脲类与其他抗糖尿病组合。或根据抗糖尿病治疗持续时间评估帽。队列76〜9DM T2DM患者的结果,我们确定了1803例帽。在将任何OAD与二甲双胍的单疗法比较时,观察到帽发生率的差异。与目前使用二甲双胍+磺酰脲类相比,噻唑烷二酮+二甲双胍与盖帽的风险增加有关(调节或= 2.48,95%CI 1.40-4.38)。使用任何与噻唑烷二酮组合的组合也与帽的风险较高有关(调节或= 2.00,95%CI 1.22-3.28)。目前使用DPP-4抑制剂与帽的风险增加无关。结论OAD在单一疗法对二甲双胍的使用之间观察到帽的发生率没有差异。与二甲双胍+磺脲类相比,组合组合使用的使用与帽的风险增加有关。使用DPP-4抑制剂与帽的风险增加无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号