首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >The effectiveness and safety of topical β‐receptor blocker in treating superficial infantile haemangiomas: A meta‐analysis including 20 studies
【24h】

The effectiveness and safety of topical β‐receptor blocker in treating superficial infantile haemangiomas: A meta‐analysis including 20 studies

机译:局部β受体阻滞剂在治疗浅表幼儿肺原瘤中的有效性和安全性:META分析,包括20项研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topical β‐receptor blocker in treating superficial infantile haemangiomas (SIH) and compare the effectiveness and safety of topical β‐receptor blocker against other therapies. Methods A search of the literature using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang were performed to identify the studies that estimated the effectiveness and safety of topical β‐receptor blocker in treating SIH, the fixed‐effect or random‐effects meta‐analytical techniques were applied to assess the outcomes. Results Twenty studies, involving 2098 patients, were included to conduct this analysis. Topical propranolol and topical timolol were discovered to be as effective as oral propranolol in treating SIH (propranolol, odds ratio [OR] = 0.486, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.165, 1.426, P = .189; timolol, OR = 0.955; 95%CI 0.700, 1.302; P = .769), and topical timolol was more effective than topical imiquimod (OR = 2.561; 95%CI 1.182, 5.550; P = .017), observation (OR = 18.458; 95%CI 5.660, 60.191; P .001) and topical saline solutions (OR = 19.193; 95%CI 8.837, 41.683; P .001) in treating SIH. The comparison between topical propranolol and oral propranolol led to no discovery of significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects (OR = 1.258; 95%CI 0.471, 3.358; P = .647). Compared with oral propranolol, topical timolol was associated with fewer incidences of adverse effects (OR = 0.191; 95%CI 0.043, 0.858; P = .031). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects was found when topical timolol and topical imiquimod were compared (OR = 0.077; 95%CI 0.005, 1.206; P = .068). Conclusion This meta‐analysis provided evidence that topical β‐receptor blockers (propranolol and timolol), especially timolol, may replace oral propranolol as a first‐line treatment for SIH.
机译:旨在评估局部β受体阻滞剂在治疗浅表幼儿肺原瘤(SIH)中的有效性和安全性,并比较局部β受体阻滞剂对其他疗法的有效性和安全性。方法使用PubMed,Embase,Cochrane评论数据库搜索文献,中国国家知识基础设施和Wanfang来确定估计局部β受体阻滞剂治疗SIH,固定效果或随机性的有效性和安全性的研究效果适用于评估结果的荟萃分析技术。结果二十项研究涉及2098名患者,涉及该分析。局部丙醇和局部托尔酚被发现在治疗SIH(普萘洛尔,大量效率[或] = 0.486,95%置信区间[CI] 0.165,1.426,P = .189; TIMOLOL,OR = 0.955时,如口服丙醇醇和局部普泊罗酚95%CI 0.700,1.302; p = .769),局部蒂莫尔比局部咪唑更有效(或= 2.561; 95%CI 1.182,5.550; p = .017),观察(或= 18.458; 95%CI 5.660 ,60.191; p& .001)和局部盐酸溶液(或= 19.193; 95%CI 8.837,41.683; p <.001)治疗SIH。局部普萘洛尔和口服丙醇醇之间的比较导致不发现不良反应发生率显着差异(或= 1.258; 95%CI 0.471,3.358; P = .647)。与口服普萘洛尔相比,局部蒂莫尔与不良反应的发生率较少(或= 0.191; 95%CI 0.043,0.858; P = .031)。当比较局部蒂莫尔和局部咪喹莫氏醇(或= 0.077; 95%CI 0.005,1.206)时,发现不良反应发生率没有显着差异。结论该元分析提供了局部β-受体阻滞剂(普萘洛尔和蒂洛尔),尤其是赤藓醇,可以替代口服普萘洛尔作为SIH的一线处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号