首页> 外文学位 >Addition of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long acting beta agonists to inhaled corticosteroid therapy for asthma treatment in older adults: A retrospective data analysis of effectiveness, safety and cost.
【24h】

Addition of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long acting beta agonists to inhaled corticosteroid therapy for asthma treatment in older adults: A retrospective data analysis of effectiveness, safety and cost.

机译:在吸入性糖皮质激素治疗中,将白三烯受体拮抗剂与长效β激动剂相比,用于老年人的哮喘治疗:有效性,安全性和成本的回顾性数据分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

sthma treatment is challenging in older adults. To date, there is no evidence from research with older adults to support choosing the most appropriate add-on treatment for inadequately controlled asthma, despite using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We retrospectively investigated the comparative effectiveness, cardiovascular (CV) safety and costs associated with ICS + leukotriene receptor antagonists (ICS+LTRA) versus ICS + long acting beta agonists (ICS+LABA) treatments. We included asthmatic Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older, who continuously enrolled in Fee for Service Medicare with Part D coverage, and treated with ICS+LABA or ICS+LTRA in an exclusive manner.;This dissertation work was organized into two major studies. Firstly, effectiveness and CV safety outcomes were compared between the two treatments. The augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator was used to determine the effect of LABA vs. LTRA add-on therapy on asthma exacerbations requiring inpatient, emergency, or outpatient care as well as CV events, adjusting for several co-variables. Our results showed that LTRA add-on treatment was associated with increased odds of asthma-related hospitalizations/emergency department visits (OR=1.4, p<0.001), and outpatient exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids or antibiotics (OR=1.41, p<0.001) compared to LABA treatment. LTRA add-on therapy also showed lower effectiveness in controlling symptoms as indicated by greater utilization of short-acting beta agonists (RR=1.58, p<0.001). On the other hand, LTRA add-on treatment was associated with lower odds of experiencing a CV event compared to LABA (OR=0.86, p=0.006).;Secondly, multivariable regression models with nonparametric bootstrapped standard errors were employed to compare all-cause and asthma-related costs between the two treatment groups. The results showed that ICS+LTRA treatment was associated with increased asthmarelated costs compared to ICS+LABA. With a mean of 1.06 person-years follow up, adjusted asthma-related costs were
机译:在老年人中,哮喘的治疗具有挑战性。迄今为止,尽管有吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)的使用,但没有针对老年人的研究证据支持为控制不佳的哮喘选择最合适的附加治疗方法。我们回顾性研究了ICS +白三烯受体拮抗剂(ICS + LTRA)与ICS +长效β受体激动剂(ICS + LABA)治疗的相对有效性,心血管(CV)安全性和费用。我们纳入了66岁及以上的哮喘病医疗保险受益人,他们连续参加D部分保险的《医疗保险费用》,并以ICS + LABA或ICS + LTRA的独家方式进行治疗。本论文的工作分为两个主要研究。首先,比较了两种治疗方法的有效性和心血管安全性结果。增强的逆倾向加权估计量用于确定LABA与LTRA附加疗法对需要住院,急诊或门诊以及CV事件的哮喘加重的影响,并调整了一些协变量。我们的结果表明,LTRA附加治疗与哮喘相关住院/急诊就诊的几率增加(OR = 1.4,p <0.001),以及需要口服糖皮质激素或抗生素的门诊加重(OR = 1.41,p <0.001)与LABA治疗相比。 LTRA附加疗法在控制症状方面也显示出较低的有效性,这是由于短效β受体激动剂的利用率更高(RR = 1.58,p <0.001)。另一方面,与LABA相比,LTRA附加治疗与发生CV事件的几率更低(OR = 0.86,p = 0.006)。其次,采用具有非参数自举标准误差的多变量回归模型比较所有两个治疗组之间的病因和哮喘相关费用。结果表明,与ICS + LABA相比,ICS + LTRA治疗与哮喘相关的费用增加有关。平均随访1.06人年,与哮喘相关的调整后费用为

著录项

  • 作者

    Altawalbeh, Shoroq Mahmoud.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Pharmaceutical sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 149 p.
  • 总页数 149
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号