...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Gap-filling a spatially explicit plant trait database: comparing imputation methods and different levels of environmental information
【24h】

Gap-filling a spatially explicit plant trait database: comparing imputation methods and different levels of environmental information

机译:填充空间显式植物特征数据库:比较避开方法和不同级别的环境信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The ubiquity of missing data in plant trait databases may hinder trait-based analyses of ecological patterns and processes. Spatially explicit datasets with information on intraspecific trait variability are rare but offer great promise in improving our understanding of functional biogeography. At the same time, they offer specific challenges in terms of data imputation. Here we compare statistical imputation approaches, using varying levels of environmental information, for five plant traits (leaf biomass to sapwood area ratio, leaf nitrogen content, maximum tree height, leaf mass per area and wood density) in a spatially explicit plant trait dataset of temperate and Mediterranean tree species (Ecological and Forest Inventory of Catalonia, IEFC, dataset for Catalonia, north-east Iberian Peninsula, 31 900 km(2)). We simulated gaps at different missingness levels (10-80 %) in a complete trait matrix, and we used overall trait means, species means, k nearest neighbours (kNN), ordinary and regression kriging, and multivariate imputation using chained equations (MICE) to impute missing trait values. We assessed these methods in terms of their accuracy and of their ability to preserve trait distributions, multi-trait correlation structure and bivariate trait relationships. The relatively good performance of mean and species mean imputations in terms of accuracy masked a poor representation of trait distributions and multivariate trait structure. Species identity improved MICE imputations for all traits, whereas forest structure and topography improved imputations for some traits. No method performed best consistently for the five studied traits, but, considering all traits and performance metrics, MICE informed by relevant ecological variables gave the best results. However, at higher missingness ( 30 %), species mean imputations and regression kriging tended to outperform MICE for some traits. MICE informed by relevant ecological variables allowed us to fill the gap
机译:植物特征数据库中缺失数据的缺失可能会阻碍基于特性的生态模式和过程的分析。具有有关内部特性变异性的空间显式数据集是罕见的,但在提高对功能性生物地理学的理解方面提供了很大的承诺。与此同时,他们在数据估算方面提供特定的挑战。在这里,我们将五种植物特征(叶片生物质到Sapwood面积比,叶氮含量,最大树高,叶片和木质密度的叶子生物质为Sapwood面积比,叶氮含量,最大树高度,叶片和木质密度)进行比较统计归毒方法温带和地中海树种(Catalonia的生态和森林库存,IEFC,Catalonia,东北伊比利亚半岛的DataSet,31 900公里(2))。我们在完整的特征矩阵中模拟不同缺失水平(10-80%)的间隙,我们使用了整体特征手段,物种方式,k最近邻居(knn),普通和回归克里格,以及使用链式方程式的多变量归档(小鼠)赋予缺少特质价值。我们在其准确性和它们保持特征分布的能力方面评估了这些方法,多特征相关结构和双重关联特征关系。在准确性方面的平均值和物种的均值和物种的表现相对较好地掩盖了特征分布和多变量特征结构的差。物种标识改善了所有特征的小鼠避难,而森林结构和地形改善了一些特征的避难所。对于五个学习的特征,无需始终如一地始终如一地执行,但考虑到所有特征和性能指标,通过相关生态变量通知的小鼠得到了最佳结果。然而,在较高的缺失(& 30%),物种均值避免和回归克里格倾向于为某些特征而倾向于老鼠。相关生态变量通知的小鼠使我们能够填补差距

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号