首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Botany >Leaf mechanical resistance in plant trait databases: comparing the results of two common measurement methods
【2h】

Leaf mechanical resistance in plant trait databases: comparing the results of two common measurement methods

机译:植物性状数据库中的叶片机械抗性:比较两种常用测量方法的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and Aims The influence of leaf mechanical properties on local ecosystem processes, such as trophic transfer, decomposition and nutrient cycling, has resulted in a growing interest in including leaf mechanical resistance in large-scale databases of plant functional traits. ‘Specific work to shear’ and ‘force to tear’ are two properties commonly used to describe mechanical resistance (toughness or strength) of leaves. Two methodologies have been widely used to measure them across large datasets. This study aimed to assess correlations and standardization between the two methods, as measured by two widely used apparatuses, in order to inter-convert existing data in those global datasets.>Methods Specific work to shear (WSS) and force to tear (FT) were measured in leaves of 72 species from south-eastern Australia. The measurements were made including and excluding midribs. Relationships between the variables were tested by Spearman correlations and ordinary least square regressions.>Key Results A positive and significant correlation was found between the methods, but coefficients varied according to the inclusion or exclusion of the midrib in the measurements. Equations for prediction varied according to leaf venation pattern. A positive and significant (r = 0·90, P < 0·0001) correlation was also found between WSS values for fresh and rehydrated leaves, which is considered to be of practical relevance.>Conclusions In the context of broad-scale ecological hypotheses and used within the constraints recommended here, leaf mechanical resistance data obtained with both methodologies could be pooled together into a single coarser variable, using the equations provided in this paper. However, more detailed datasets of FT cannot be safely filled in with estimations based on WSS, or vice versa. In addition, WSS values of green leaves can be predicted with good accuracy from WSS of rehydrated leaves of the same species.
机译:>背景和目标:叶片机械特性对局部生态系统过程(如营养转移,分解和养分循环)的影响,引起了人们对将叶片机械抗性纳入大型植物功能数据库的兴趣日益浓厚特质。 “特定的剪切功”和“撕裂力”是通常用来描述叶片机械阻力(韧性或强度)的两个属性。两种方法已广泛用于跨大型数据集进行度量。这项研究旨在评估两种方法之间的相关性和标准化程度(由两个使用广泛的仪器测量),以便相互转换这些全局数据集中的现有数据。>方法剪切的特定工作(WSS)和在来自澳大利亚东南部的72种植物的叶片中测量了撕裂力(FT)。进行了测量,包括和不包括中肋骨。通过Spearman相关性和普通最小二乘回归检验变量之间的关系。>主要结果方法之间存在正相关和显着相关性,但系数根据测量中是否包含中脉而变化。预测方程根据叶片的通气模式而变化。新鲜和水合叶片的WSS值之间也存在正相关(r significant =(0·90,P <0·0001),这被认为具有实际意义。>结论鉴于广泛的生态假设并在此处建议的限制范围内使用,使用本文提供的方程式,可以将通过两种方法获得的叶片机械阻力数据汇总到一个较粗的变量中。但是,无法使用基于WSS的估计安全地填充FT的更详细的数据集,反之亦然。此外,可以从相同物种的复水叶的WSS准确预测绿叶的WSS值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号