首页> 外文期刊>British journal of sports medicine >Is live high-train low altitude training relevant for elite athletes? Flawed analysis from inaccurate data
【24h】

Is live high-train low altitude training relevant for elite athletes? Flawed analysis from inaccurate data

机译:是高火车低空训练,与精英运动员相关吗? 不准确的数据缺陷分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since 2012, Lundby and Robach have consistently stated that 'altitude training does not convincingly increase exercise performance and should not be recommended to elite (endurance) athletes', This research group suggests that altitude training and particularly 'live high-train low (LHTL) may only increase total haemoglobin mass (Hb(mass) [and possibly maximal oxygen consumption (VO_(2max] in athletes with an initial low Hb_(niass) value'. This statement comes from the analysis of nine selected studies on the relationship between group mean pre-LHTL value of Hb_(mass) and increase in Hb after LHTL. The inverse correlation (r=-0.86; P<0.01) between initial Hb_(mass) value and percentage increase in Hb would suggest that athletes starting an intervention with high relative Hb_(mass) levels have smaller chances to further increase their relative Hb following altitude training. The rationale behind was that those athletes had already maximised their Hb_(mass) level by training at sea level.
机译:自2012年以来,Lundby和Robach一直指出,“高度培训并不令人信服地提高运动表现,而不应建议以精英(耐力)运动员,这一研究小组建议高原培训,特别是”现场高火车低(LHTL)“可能只会增加总血红蛋白质量(HB(质量)[可能最大的氧气消耗(在运动员中有最大的氧气消耗(vo_(2max],具有初始低Hb_(niass)值的运动员。该声明来自分析九个所选研究的基础之间的关系平均HB_(质量)的LHTL值和LHTL之后的HB增加。初始HB_(质量)值与HB的百分比增加之间的反相(R = -0.86; p <0.01)建议运动员开始干预高相对HB_(质量)水平具有较小的机会,以便在高度训练后进一步增加其相对HB。背后的理由是那些运动员已经通过海平面培训最大化了他们的HB_(质量)水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号