首页> 外文期刊>British journal of learning disabilities >The clinical approach used in supporting individuals with intellectual disability who have been sexually abused
【24h】

The clinical approach used in supporting individuals with intellectual disability who have been sexually abused

机译:用于支持具有性虐待的智力残疾个人的临床方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accessible Summary Sexual abuse is when someone does something sexual to someone else when they do not want them to. We wanted to find out how people get help after sexual abuse. We learned that talking with a psychologist or with staff helps. It is best if these are people you trust. It is also important that you know that the help will work. How everyone involved in a person's support thinks about the abuse also plays a role in the kind of help a person gets. Abstract Background Although sexual abuse ( SA ) constitutes a significant problem in intellectual disability settings, little is known regarding how services support individuals with intellectual disability who have been abused. Method Using a qualitative design, we explored how one voluntary community service, and in particular their psychology department, responded when people with intellectual disability presented with a clinical need regarding an abuse history. A collective case study was completed based on triangulated data from the clinical files of six individuals with intellectual disability, and based on nine interviews with individuals and/or informants (i.e., psychologists, staff) regarding the six cases. Results Thematic analysis indicated psychology's and staff's role in delivering behavioural support and psychotherapy. Themes of trust, confidence and suggestibility are relevant to the therapeutic process in cases of abuse, while factors such as the attitudes of support providers may impact therapeutic engagement. Conclusions In the absence of a sufficient evidence base in intellectual disability, there is little to guide clinicians working psychotherapeutically with the issue of SA and further research is crucial. While practitioners may perceive particular approaches to be helpful, caution is warranted and feedback from multiple stakeholders is an essential component of safe practice in instances of the delivery of an experimental approach.
机译:无障碍摘要性虐待是当有人在不希望他们的时候对别人做了什么。我们想了解人们在性虐待后如何获得帮助。我们了解到与心理学家或工作人员有帮助。最好是,如果这些是你信任的人。您知道帮助将工作也很重要。涉及一个人的支持的人如何考虑虐待虐待也起到了一个人的帮助。摘要背景虽然性虐待(SA)构成了知识分子残疾环境中的重大问题,但对于如何滥用的知识分子残疾人的服务,众所周知。使用定性设计的方法,我们探讨了一个自愿社区服务,特别是他们的心理学部门,当智力残疾人患者有关滥用历史的临床需求时,应对。根据具有智力残疾的六个人的临床档案的三角形数据完成了一项集体案例研究,并根据九个案件的个人和/或通讯员(即心理学家,工作人员)的九次访谈。结果专题分析表明心理学和员工在提供行为支持和心理治疗方面的作用。信任,信心和建议的主题与滥用案件的治疗过程有关,而支持提供者的态度等因素可能会影响治疗性参与。结论在没有充分证实智力残疾的证据基础的情况下,几乎没有指导临床医生随着SA问题和进一步的研究至关重要的问题。虽然从业者可能会感到有帮助的措施,但谨慎的谨慎,并且来自多个利益攸关方的反馈是在实验方法的交付情况下安全实践的重要组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号