首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cytologica: The Journal of Clinical Cytology and Cytopathology >Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: Analysis of 240 consecutive cases
【24h】

Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: Analysis of 240 consecutive cases

机译:与传统的现场评估相比,实施细胞学来立即评估内镜超声引导下的细针穿刺抽吸:分析240例连续病例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the implementation of telecytology in an academic cytology service for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endobronchoscopic ultrasound (EBUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Study Design: Telecytology was evaluated over a 10-month period. Using an Olympus BX41? microscope and an Olympus DP72? camera with Olympus cellSens? software, real-time dynamic images of air-dried Diff-Quik?-stained smears were transmitted by a cytopathology fellow or cytotechnologist using a secure internet connection. The cytopathologists remotely accessed the real-time images on a computer in their office and rendered immediate assessments. Mean procedure times, and preliminary and final diagnoses were compared between telecytology and conventional on-site evaluation. Results: Two hundred and forty consecutive EUS-FNA and EBUS-FNA procedures with immediate assessments were performed during the evaluation period, of which 158 (66%) utilized telecytology and 82 (34%) did not utilize telecytology. The mean procedure time required for cytotechnologists and cytology fellows was 1.1 h for both conventional on-site and telecytology evaluations. The mean procedure time for cytopathologists was 0.74 h for conventional on-site evaluations and 0.2 h for telecytology. Conclusions: Incorporation of telecytology for immediate assessment of EUS-FNA increased cytopathologist efficiency.
机译:目的:评估远距离细胞学在学术细胞学服务中的实施情况,以立即评估内镜超声(EUS)和支气管镜超声(EBUS)细针穿刺(FNA)。研究设计:进行了10个月的评估,以评估细胞学。使用奥林巴斯BX41?显微镜和奥林巴斯DP72?奥林巴斯cellSens相机?通过软件,风干的Diff-Quik?染色涂片的实时动态图像由细胞病理学家或细胞技术专家使用安全的互联网连接进行传输。细胞病理学家远程访问办公室中计算机上的实时图像,并立即做出评估。比较了细胞学检查和常规现场评估之间的平均手术时间以及初步诊断和最终诊断。结果:在评估期间,共进行了240次连续EUS-FNA和EBUS-FNA程序的即时评估,其中158(66%)个使用细胞学,而82个(34%)未使用细胞学。对于传统的现场和远程细胞学评估,细胞技术人员和细胞学研究人员所需的平均操作时间为1.1小时。对于常规的现场评估,细胞病理学家的平均手术时间为0.74小时,而对于远程细胞学则为0.2小时。结论:纳入远距细胞学以立即评估EUS-FNA可提高细胞病理学家的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号