首页> 外文期刊>Brain stimulation >Deep brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: Systematic review of cases and ethics
【24h】

Deep brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: Systematic review of cases and ethics

机译:深脑刺激意识障碍:对案件和道德的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background A treatment for patients suffering from prolonged severely altered consciousness is not available. The success of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in diseases such as Parkinson's, dystonia and essential tremor provided a renewed impetus for its application in Disorders of Consciousness (DoC). Objective To evaluate the rationale for DBS in patients with DoC, through systematic review of literature containing clinical data and ethical considerations. Methods Articles from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Results The outcomes of 78 individual patients reported in 19 articles from 1968 onwards were pooled and elements of ethical discussions were compared. There is no clear clinical evidence that DBS is a treatment for DoC that can restore both consciousness and the ability to communicate. In patients who benefitted, the outcome of DBS is often confounded by the time frame of spontaneous recovery from DoC. Difficult ethical considerations remain, such as the risk of increasing self-awareness of own limitations, without improving overall wellbeing, and the issues of proxy consent. Conclusion DBS is far from being evident as a possible future therapeutic avenue for patients with DoC. Double-blind studies are lacking, and many clinical and ethical issues have to be addressed. In the rare cases when DBS for patients with DoC is considered, this needs to be evaluated meticulously on a case by case basis, with comprehensive overall outcome measures including psychological and quality-of-life assessments, and with the guidance of an ethical and interdisciplinary panel, especially in relation to proxy consent. Highlights ? Spontaneous recovery can often not be excluded in outcomes of DBS for DoC. ? Proxy consent and patients' self-awareness of own limitations are main ethical issues. ? There is no satisfying clinical evidence for a meaningful effect of DBS for DoC. ? DBS for DoC must be evaluated case by case, including a psychological assessment.
机译:摘要背景患者患有长期严重改变意识的患者的治疗。深脑刺激(DBS)在帕金森,缺陷和基本震颤等疾病中的成功为其在意识障碍(DOC)的应用提供了重新推动。目的通过含有临床资料和道德考虑的文献系统综述,评估DOC患者DBS的理由。方法综述了来自PubMed,Embase,Medline和Web的文章。结果78篇患者的成果于1968年从1968年开始报告,并汇总了道德讨论的要素。没有明确的临床证据表明,DBS是一种可以恢复意识和沟通能力的医生的治疗方法。在受益的患者中,DB的结果往往被Doc自发恢复的时间框架混淆。艰难的道德考虑因素仍然存在,例如增加自身局限性的自我意识的风险,而不会改善整体健康,以及代理同意的问题。结论DBS远非显而易见为医生患者可能的未来治疗大道。缺乏双盲研究,必须解决许多临床和道德问题。在罕见的情况下,考虑DOC患者的DBS时,这需要根据案例进行精心评估这一点,全面的整体结果措施,包括心理和生活质量评估,以及道德和跨学科的指导小组,特别是关于代理同意。强调 ?自发恢复通常不会被排除在DOC的DBS结果中。还代理同意和患者自我意识自身限制是主要的道德问题。还没有满足DB的DBS的有意义效果的临床证据。还必须按案例评估DOC的DBS,包括心理评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号