首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low‐risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study
【24h】

Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low‐risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study

机译:助理在美国医疗中心和劳动护理和出生后的助性和劳动力的低风险妇女:一项关于安全劳工研究的联盟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background The presence of midwives in a health system may affect perinatal outcomes but has been inadequately described in United States settings. Our objective was to compare labor processes and outcomes for low‐risk nulliparous women birthing in United States medical centers with interprofessional care (midwives and physicians) versus noninterprofessional care (physicians only). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Consortium on Safe Labor data from low‐risk nulliparous women who birthed in interprofessional (n?=?7393) or noninterprofessional centers (n?=?6982). Unadjusted, adjusted (age, race, health insurance type), propensity‐adjusted, and propensity‐matched logistic regression models were used to compare outcomes. Results There was concordance across logistic regression models, the most restrictive and conservative of which were propensity‐matched models. With this approach, women at interprofessional medical centers, compared with women at noninterprofessional centers, were 74% less likely to undergo labor induction (risk ratio [RR] 0.26; 95% CI 0.24‐0.29) and 75% less likely to have oxytocin augmentation (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.22‐0.29). The cesarean birth rate was 12% lower at interprofessional centers (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79‐0.98). Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in only 0.3% of births and were thus too rare to be modeled. Conclusions The care processes and birth outcomes at interprofessional and noninterprofessional medical centers differed significantly. Nulliparous women receiving care at interprofessional centers were less likely to experience induction, oxytocin augmentation, and cesarean than women at noninterprofessional centers. Labor care and birth outcome differences between interprofessional and noninterprofessional centers may be the result of the presence of midwives and interprofessional collaboration, organizational culture, or both.
机译:摘要背景在卫生系统中的助产士的存在可能影响围产期结果,但在美国的环境中已经不充分描述。我们的目标是将劳动过程和结果进行比较美国医疗中心的低风险无损失妇女与贸易思想护理(助产士和医生)与非互惠性护理(仅限医生)进行分娩。方法采用来自销售侦查(n?= 7393)或非互总性中心的低危劳动数据,使用联盟对来自低风险损失的妇女进行的回顾性队列研究。不调整的,调整(年龄,竞赛,健康保险类型),调整和匹配匹配的逻辑回归模型,用于比较结果。结果横跨逻辑回归模型的一致性,最具限制性和保守的,它是匹配的型号。通过这种方法,与非互勤人员中心的女性相比,妇女在非勤勉中心的妇女减少了74%,可能发生劳动诱导(风险比率[RR] 0.26; 95%CI 0.24-0.29)和催产素增强的75%较小(RR 0.25; 95%CI 0.22-0.29)。剖宫学中心的剖宫产率下降12%(RR 0.88; 95%CI 0.79-0.98)。不良新生儿结果仅为0.3%的出生而发生,因此太少了才能进行建模。结论思想和非互工医疗中心的护理程序和出生结果显着不同。在侦查中心接受护理的无烟妇女不太可能经历诱导,催产素增强和剖宫产,而不是非互专业中心的妇女。劳动力和促进贸易关键人偶中心之间的差异可能是助产士和思想协作,组织文化或两者都存在的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号