首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Birth plans—Impact on mode of delivery, obstetrical interventions, and birth experience satisfaction: A prospective cohort study
【24h】

Birth plans—Impact on mode of delivery, obstetrical interventions, and birth experience satisfaction: A prospective cohort study

机译:出生计划 - 影响交付方式,产科干预和出生经验满意度:一个潜在的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective To examine whether the presence of a birth plan was associated with mode of delivery, obstetrical interventions, and patient satisfaction. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies greater than 34?weeks’ gestation powered to evaluate a difference in mode of delivery. Maternal characteristics, antenatal factors, neonatal characteristics, and patient satisfaction measures were compared between groups. Differences between groups were analyzed using chi‐squared for categorical variables, Fisher exact test for dichotomous variables, and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous or ordinal variables. Results Three hundred women were recruited: 143 (48%) had a birth plan. There was no significant difference in the risk of cesarean delivery for women with a birth plan compared with those without a birth plan (21% vs 16%, adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61‐2.04]). Women with a birth plan were 28% less likely to receive oxytocin ( P ??.01), 29% less likely to undergo artificial rupture of membranes ( P ??.01), and 31% less likely to have an epidural ( P ??.01). There was no difference in the length of labor ( P ?=?.12). Women with a birth plan were less satisfied ( P ??.01) and felt less in control ( P ??.01) of their birth experience than those without a birth plan. Conclusion Women with and without a birth plan had similar odds of cesarean delivery. Though they had fewer obstetrical interventions, they were less satisfied with their birth experience, compared with women without birth plans. Further research is needed to understand how to improve childbirth‐related patient satisfaction.
机译:摘要目的探讨出生计划的存在是否与交付方式,产科干预和患者满意度有关。方法这是一项预期队列的单身妊娠,大于34?周的妊娠值,提供了评估交付方式的差异。在组之间比较母体特征,产前因子,新生儿特征和患者满意度措施。使用Chi平方进行分类的分类变量,对二分变量的Fisher精确测试分析了组之间的差异,以及连续或序变量的Wilcoxon等级和测试。结果招募了三百名女性:143(48%)有一个诞生计划。与诞生计划的妇女剖腹产风险没有显着差异,与没有出生计划的人(21%与16%,调整的赔率比[亚律] 1.11 [95%置信区间(CI)0.61-2.04] )。出生计划的女性可能接受催产素的可能性减去28%(p?& 01),可能发生膜的人工破裂的可能性较小29%(p?& 01),并且有可能具有31%的可能性硬膜外(P?&Δ01)。劳动长度没有差异(p?= 12)。具有出生计划的女性不满足(p?&& 01),并且对其出生体验的控制(p?& 01)比没有出生计划的那些感觉更少。结论未经出生计划的妇女具有类似的剖宫产的几率。虽然它们具有更少的产科干预措施,但与未经出生计划的妇女相比,它们对他们的出生经验感到不满意。需要进一步的研究来了解如何改善与分娩相关的患者满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号