...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis: an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis >Comparison of international normalized ratio determined by point-of-care to standard laboratory testing before and after reversal of heparin in cardiac surgery
【24h】

Comparison of international normalized ratio determined by point-of-care to standard laboratory testing before and after reversal of heparin in cardiac surgery

机译:在心脏手术中肝素逆转前后的标准实验室测试确定的国际标准化比率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objective To compare point-of-care (POC) of international normalized ratio to laboratory-derived values before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, with the primary aim of evaluating for any change in the relationship between the tests. Methods This is a prospective observational study with 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery enrolled. The International normalized ratio measured at two time points, precardiopulmonary bypass and after heparin reversal with protamine using both POC i-STAT and standard laboratory analysis for both time points. A difference of 0.2 between tests at either time point was considered clinically significant based on previous literature. A pairedttest was used to test for a changing or statistically significant mean difference between tests. At both time points values were categorized into absolute difference of more than 0.2 or less than 0.2, and a Fisher's exact test was used to determine if an association existed between heparin reversal and a difference more than 0.2. Bland-Altman plots were also evaluated for agreement. Results A statistically and clinically significant mean difference [0.09 vs. 0.25, difference -0.163 95% confidence interval (-0.25, -0.08),P = 0.003] was seen between the laboratory and POC tests when pre and postheparin reversal samples were compared. A significantly greater number of patients had a clinically relevant difference between the tests post compared with pre (four patients vs. 18 patients,P = 0.001). Linear regression analysis of the difference compared with the means, showed significant correlation suggesting the presence of a proportional bias (prer = 0.488,P = <0.01, postr = 0.571,P = <0.01). Conclusion Clinically significant differences exist between POC and laboratory testing of international normalized ratio after heparin reversal during cardiac surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03267823.
机译:研究目的是将国际标准化比率的护理(POC)与生心肺旁路前后和之后的实验室衍生的值进行比较,主要目的是评估测试之间的关系的任何变化。方法是,这是一个预期心脏手术的50名患者的前瞻性观察研究。使用POC I-Stat和标准实验室分析,在两次时间点,前肢体旁路和肝素旁路和肝素逆转后测量的国际标准化比率。基于先前的文献,在临床上被认为是临床显着的0.2之间的差异。 FairedTTEST用于测试测试之间的变化或统计上显着的平均差异。在两个时间点,值被分类为大于0.2或小于0.2的绝对差,并且使用渔民的确切试验来确定肝素逆转之间是否存在于肝素之间的关联,并且差异大于0.2。也评估了Bland-Altman情节的协议。结果统计和临床上显着的平均差异[0.09 V.0.25,差异-0.163 95%置信区间(-0.25,-0.08),在实验室和POC测试之间观察到PRE和POC肝素逆转样品之间的实验室和POC试验。与前期(4例患者对18例患者,P = 0.001)相比,测试柱之间的临床相关差异显着更多的患者。与手段相比的线性回归分析与手段相比,表明存在比例偏压的存在性(PRER = 0.488,P = <0.01,POSTR = 0.571,P = <0.01)。结论肝素手术逆转后国际标准化比率与实验室检测存在临床上的显着差异。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03267823。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号