...
【24h】

QALYs in obstetrics: not the whole story

机译:Qalys在妇产:不是整个故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Universal ultrasound scanning for macrosomia... is not cost-effective... is not warranted.' Wastlund et al. offer this conclusion from a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of universal versus selective screening for macrosomia with ultrasound (BJOG 2019; 126: 1243-50). This decisive statement reveals interesting observations about CEA in obstetrics. The authors conclude that universal screening for macrosomia is not cost-effective based on a widely accepted threshold in the UK: €20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). As the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of universal screening with induction of labour for macrosomia was €52,719 per QALY when compared with selective ultrasound plus labour induction, it is not considered to be cost-effective.
机译:通用超声扫描用于麦科瘤......不是成本效益......不保证。 Wastlund等。 提供由Ultrasound的Macrosomia的Universal VerseSive筛选的成本效益分析(CEA)结论(BJog 2019; 126:1243-50)。 这种决定性陈述揭示了对妇产科的有趣观察。 作者得出结论,基于英国广泛接受的门槛,巨大筛查的通用筛查并不具有成本效益:每年质量调整的寿命为20,000-30,000欧元。 随着丙癌劳动促进促进巨大筛查的增量成本效益比(ICER)与选择性超声加劳动诱导相比,每QALY为52,719欧元,但不被认为是具有成本效益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号