首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth
【24h】

Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth

机译:可见分解:对全球报告的死产原因进行系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Stillbirth is a global health problem. The World Health Organization ( WHO ) application of the International Classification of Diseases for perinatal mortality ( ICD ‐ PM ) aims to improve data on stillbirth to enable prevention. Objectives To identify globally reported causes of stillbirth, classification systems, and alignment with the ICD ‐ PM . Search strategy We searched CINAHL , EMBASE , Medline, Global Health, and Pubmed from 2009 to 2016. Selection criteria Reports of stillbirth causes in unselective cohorts. Data collection and analysis Pooled estimates of causes were derived for country representative reports. Systems and causes were assessed for alignment with the ICD ‐ PM . Data are presented by income setting (low, middle, and high income countries; LIC , MIC , HIC ). Main results Eighty‐five reports from 50 countries (489?089 stillbirths) were included. The most frequent categories were Unexplained, Antepartum haemorrhage, and Other (all settings); Infection and Hypoxic peripartum ( LIC ), and Placental ( MIC , HIC ). Overall report quality was low. Only one classification system fully aligned with ICD ‐ PM . All stillbirth causes mapped to ICD ‐ PM . In a subset from HIC, mapping obscured major causes. Conclusions There is a paucity of quality information on causes?of stillbirth globally. Improving investigation of stillbirths?and standardisation of audit and classification is urgently needed and should be achievable in all well‐resourced settings. Implementation of the WHO Perinatal Mortality Audit and Review guide is needed, particularly across high burden settings. Funding HR , SH , SHL , and AW were supported by an NHMRC ‐ CRE grant ( APP 1116640). VF was funded by an NHMRC ‐ CDF ( APP 1123611). Tweetable abstract Urgent need to improve data on causes of stillbirths across all settings to meet global targets. Plain Language Summary Background and methods Nearly three million babies are stillborn every year. These deaths have deep and long‐lasting effects on parents, healthcare providers, and the society. One of the major challenges to preventing stillbirths is the lack of information about why they happen. In this study, we collected reports on the causes of stillbirth from high‐, middle‐, and low‐income countries to: (1) Understand the causes of stillbirth, and (2) Understand how to improve reporting of stillbirths. Findings We found 85 reports from 50 different countries. The information available from the reports was inconsistent and often of poor quality, so it was hard to get a clear picture about what are the causes of stillbirth across the world. Many different definitions of stillbirth were used. There was also wide variation in what investigations of the mother and baby were undertaken to identify the cause of stillbirth. Stillbirths in all income settings (low‐, middle‐, and high‐income countries) were most frequently reported as Unexplained , Other , and Haemorrhage (bleeding) . Unexplained and Other are not helpful in understanding why a baby was stillborn. In low‐income countries, stillbirths were often attributed to Infection and Complications during labour and birth . In middle‐ and high‐income countries, stillbirths were often reported as Placental complications . Limitations We may have missed some reports as searches were carried out in English only. The available reports were of poor quality. Implications Many countries, particularly those where the majority of stillbirths occur, do not report any information about these deaths. Where there are reports, the quality is often poor. It is important to improve the investigation and reporting of stillbirth using a standardised system so that policy makers and healthcare workers can develop effective stillbirth prevention programs. All stillbirths should be investigated and reported in line with the World Health Organization standards.
机译:背叛是一种全球健康问题。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)在围产期死亡率(ICD - PM)的应用国际疾病分类旨在改善有关死产的数据,以实现预防。目标是识别全球报告的死产原因,分类系统和与ICD - PM对齐。搜索策略我们从2009年到2016年搜索了Cinahl,Embase,Medline,Global Health和Pubmed。未经选择性队列中死亡生动原因的选择标准报告。为国家代表报告提供数据收集和分析汇总原因估计。评估系统和原因以与ICD - PM对齐。数据由收入设定(低,中等和高收入国家; LIC,MIC,HIC)提供。主要结果包括50个国家的八十五个报告(489年?089次死产)。最常见的类别是未解释的,胃窦出血和其他(所有设置);感染和缺氧Peripartum(LIC)和胎盘(MIC,HIC)。总报告质量很低。只有一个分类系统与ICD - PM完全对齐。所有死产导致映射到ICD - PM。在HIC的一个子集中,绘制遮挡的主要原因。结论在全球中存在有关原因的质量信息缺乏。改善了对死产的调查?迫切需要审计和分类标准化,并在所有良好的资源设置中可以实现。需要实施WHO产后死亡率审计和审查指南,特别是在高负担环境中。 NHMRC - CRE补助金提供资金HR,SH,SHL和AW(APP 1116640)。 VF由NHMRC - CDF资助(APP 1123611)资助。 Twelable摘要迫切需要改进所有设置中的死产原因数据,以满足全球目标。普通语言摘要背景和方法每年都有近300万婴儿。这些死亡对父母,医疗保健提供者和社会具有深厚和持久的影响。预防死产的主要挑战之一是缺乏关于他们为何发生的信息。在这项研究中,我们收集了高,中等和低收入国家的死产原因的报告:(1)了解死产的原因,(2)了解如何改善死产的报告。调查结果我们发现了来自50个不同国家的85个报告。报告中可获得的信息不一致,往往具有差的质量,因此很难清楚地了解世界上存在的死产原因是什么。使用了许多不同的死产定义。对母亲和婴儿的调查进行了广泛的变化,以确定死产的原因。所有收入设置(低收入和高收入国家)的死产最常被报告为未解释,其他和出血(出血)。无法解释的,其他人没有帮助了解为什么一个婴儿被生根的原因。在低收入国家,死产往往归因于劳动和出生期间的感染和并发症。在中期和高收入国家,死产经常被报告为胎盘并发症。当搜索只用英语进行时,我们可能错过了一些报告。可用的报告质量差。致力于许多国家,特别是那些大多数死产发生的国家,不报告有关这些死亡的任何信息。有报道的地方,质量往往很差。重要的是要使用标准化系统改进死产的调查和报告,以便政策制定者和医疗保健工人可以制定有效的死产预防计划。应调查所有死产,并符合世界卫生组织标准。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteMelbourne Vic. Australia;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Griffith University School of MedicineGold Coast QLD Australia;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special;

    London School of Hygiene &

    Tropical MedicineLondon UK;

    MBRRACE‐UKUniversity of Leicester Centre for MedicineLeicester UK;

    International Stillbirth AllianceBristol UK;

    Norwegian Institute of Public HealthOslo Norway;

    Perinatal InstituteBirmingham UK;

    International Stillbirth AllianceBristol UK;

    International Stillbirth AllianceBristol UK;

    University of SydneySydney NSW Australia;

    Division of Developmental BiomedicineUniversity of ManchesterManchester UK;

    SA PathologyWomen's and Children's HospitalNorth Adelaide SA Australia;

    Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMartini HospitalGroningen the Netherlands;

    London School of Hygiene &

    Tropical MedicineLondon UK;

    International Stillbirth AllianceBristol UK;

    Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourne Vic. Australia;

    Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoria South Africa;

    Department of Clinical Science Intervention and TechnologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholm Sweden;

    International Stillbirth AllianceBristol UK;

    University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake City UT USA;

    Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridge UK;

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special;

    Centre of Research Excellence in StillbirthThe University of Queensland (MRI‐UQ)Brisbane QLD;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 妇产科学;
  • 关键词

    cause of death; classification; ICD; Stillbirth; systems;

    机译:死因;分类;ICD;死土;系统;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号