首页> 外文期刊>Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia >The Pedagogy of Teaching and Assessing Clinical Reasoning for Enhancing the Professional Competence: A Systematic Review
【24h】

The Pedagogy of Teaching and Assessing Clinical Reasoning for Enhancing the Professional Competence: A Systematic Review

机译:教学教学与评估临床推理,提升专业能力:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Clinical reasoning (CR) is considered to foster clinical practice and competence. However, very few faculty development programs are available that can enhance the faculty's expertize in this innovative educational strategy. This study aims at elaborating the core concepts of teaching and assessing CR that can equip medical faculty with the desired knowledge and competence. The databases of ISI web of knowledge, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were searched for the full-text English-language articles published during 2000 to 2015 using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords "Clinical reasoning" AND "Meta-cognitive" OR "Flipped classroom" OR "Work-place based assessment" OR "Clinical competence" OR "Experiential learning" AND "Debrief". Initial search showed 771 articles. Further search on the bibliographic list and exclusion of non-relevant material finalized 58 articles for this systematic review. The body of literature has shown that teaching CR challenges the learner to manage a given case by data acquisition, diagnostic solutions, and dual processing of information in an integrated and cohesive learning environment. Several educational strategies are employed: metacognition, deliberate practice, experiential learning, and clinical debrief using a flipped classroom model in a blended learning approach. Due to multi-dimensional and context-specific characteristics of CR, Assessment of this domain is challenging. Several assessment tools such as multiple choice and extended matching questions, script concordance test, long case examination, mini-CEX, and portfolios are shown to have the desired reliability and validity to assess CR skills. Literature has shown an encouraging trend towards the faculty acquisition of clinical reasoning skills that requires careful scaffolding of this domain throughout the curriculum. A myriad of instructional strategies and assessment modalities are used in developing CR skills. Faculty development programs should train the faculty in enhancing the desired expertize for teaching and assessing CR skills.
机译:临床推理(CR)被认为促进临床实践和能力。但是,很少有少数教师发展计划可以提高教师在这种创新教育战略中的专业化。本研究旨在阐述教学的核心概念和评估可以用所需的知识和能力装备医学教科性的CR。使用医疗主题标题(网格)关键字“临床推理”和“荟萃认知”,搜索了2000年至2015年期间发表的全文英语文章的ISI网络数据库。或“翻转课堂”或“基于工作场所的评估”或“临床能力”或“体验学习”和“汇报”。初始搜索显示771篇文章。进一步搜索书目清单和排除非相关材料最终确定的58条制度审查。文献的身体表明,教学CR挑战学习者通过数据采集,诊断解决方案和集成和凝聚力学习环境中的信息的双重处理来管理给定案例。采用了几种教育策略:使用翻转的学习方法使用翻转的课堂模型进行了几种教育策略由于CR的多维和上下文特定特征,该领域的评估是具有挑战性的。几种评估工具,如多项选择和扩展匹配问题,脚本一致性测试,长案例检查,迷你CEX和投资组合,以获得所需的可靠性和有效性来评估CR技能。文学表现出一种令人鼓舞的趋势,旨在获得在整个课程中需要仔细脚手架的临床推理技能的令人鼓舞的趋势。在开发CR技能方面使用了一个有无数的教学战略和评估方式。教师发展计划应培养教师加强所需的教学专业化和评估CR技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号