首页> 外文期刊>Acta Dermato-Venereologica >Subbandage pressure measurements comparing a long-stretch with a short-stretch compression bandage.
【24h】

Subbandage pressure measurements comparing a long-stretch with a short-stretch compression bandage.

机译:子绷带压力测量将长拉伸绷带与短拉伸压缩绷带进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forty-three patients with venous leg ulcers were randomized into treatment with either a long- or a short-stretch compression bandage. Subbandage pressure was regularly measured during rest and walking for a period of up to 1 year. The long-stretch bandage was kept on as long as possible, often up to 1 week. It maintained a significantly higher subbandage pressure in the upright position and during passive dependency as well as during walking than the short-stretch bandage after both 2 and 24 h. The difference between maximum and minimum subbandage pressures during walking did not differ between the two groups. Thus, in contrast to general opinion, the short-stretch bandage did not produce a higher peak working pressure than the long-stretch bandage. The pressure decreased in the supine position in both groups.
机译:43例静脉曲张性溃疡患者被随机分为长或短拉伸加压绷带治疗。在休息和行走过程中(长达1年)定期测量子带的压力。长距离绷带要保持尽可能长的时间,通常长达1周。与在2小时和24小时后的短绷带相比,它在直立位置和被动依赖性以及步行过程中均保持较高的子绷带压力。两组在行走过程中最大和最小子带压之间的差异没有差异。因此,与一般观点相反,短拉伸绷带没有产生比长拉伸绷带更高的峰值工作压力。两组的仰卧位压力均降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号