首页> 外文期刊>Trials >STICKS study – Short-sTretch Inelastic Compression bandage in Knee Swelling following total knee arthroplasty – a feasibility study
【24h】

STICKS study – Short-sTretch Inelastic Compression bandage in Knee Swelling following total knee arthroplasty – a feasibility study

机译:STICKS研究–全膝关节置换术后膝关节肿胀的短拉伸非弹性压缩绷带–可行性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Postoperative knee swelling is common and impairs early postoperative function following total knee arthroplasty. It was hypothesised that the use of a short-stretch, inelastic compression bandage would reduce knee swelling and improve pain and early function. The aim of this study was to provide preliminary data and test feasibility with a view to informing a larger, future trial. Methods Fifty consecutive patients selected for primary total knee arthroplasty underwent distance randomisation to receive a short-stretch, inelastic compression bandage or a standard wool and crepe bandage for the first 24?h postoperatively. Study feasibility including recruitment rates, retention rates and complications were analysed. The Oxford Knee Score, the EQ-5D-3L index score, knee swelling, knee range of motion, visual analogue pain score and length of stay were compared between groups. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed adjusting for the preoperative measurement. Results Sixty-eight percent of eligible patients were recruited into the trial. The retention rate was 88%. There were no complications regarding compression bandage use. There was a greater mean but non-significant improvement in Oxford Knee Score ( p =?0.580; point estimate?=?2.1; 95% CI ?3.288 to 7.449) and EQ-5D-3L index score ( p =?0.057; point estimate?=?0.147; 95% CI ?0.328 to 0.005) in the compression bandage group at 6?months. There was no significant difference between groups regarding knee swelling, knee range of motion, visual analogue pain score, complications and length of stay. Conclusion Preliminary data suggests that the use of an inelastic, short-stretch compression bandage following total knee arthroplasty is a safe technique that is acceptable to patients. A larger, multicentre trial is required to determine its effect postoperatively. Trial registration The study was registered with Current Controlled Trials, identifier: ISRCTN86903140 . Registered on 30 May 2013.
机译:背景技术术后膝关节肿胀很普遍,并且在全膝关节置换术后损害了早期术后功能。假设使用短伸展,无弹性的压缩绷带可减少膝盖肿胀并改善疼痛和早期功能。这项研究的目的是提供初步数据和测试可行性,以期为更大的未来试验提供依据。方法选择连续进行初次全膝关节置换术的50例患者,在术后最初的24小时内接受距离随机,短弹力,无弹性加压绷带或标准的羊毛和绉纱绷带。分析了包括招募率,保留率和并发症在内的研究可行性。比较两组之间的牛津膝关节评分,EQ-5D-3L指数评分,膝关节肿胀,膝关节活动范围,视觉模拟疼痛评分和住院时间。进行协方差分析(ANCOVA)以调整术前测量。结果招募了68%的合格患者进入试验。保留率为88%。使用加压绷带没有并发症。牛津膝关节评分(p =?0.580;得分估计值?=?2.1; 95%CI得分3.288至7.449)和EQ-5D-3L指数得分(p =?0.057;得分)有较大的平均但无显着改善估计绷带组在6个月时的估计值=?0.147; 95%CI?0.328至0.005)。两组之间在膝关节肿胀,膝关节活动范围,视觉模拟疼痛评分,并发症和住院时间方面无显着差异。结论初步数据表明,在全膝关节置换术后使用无弹性的短拉伸加压绷带是一种安全的技术,患者可以接受。需要更大的,多中心的试验来确定术后效果。试验注册该研究已向“当前对照试验”注册,标识符为:ISRCTN86903140。 2013年5月30日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号