首页> 外文期刊>Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section C. Food Economics >Winners and losers from food industry policy: an application to Danish food industry firms.
【24h】

Winners and losers from food industry policy: an application to Danish food industry firms.

机译:食品工业政策的赢家和输家:丹麦食品工业公司的申请。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy impacts on food industry firms are investigated. A new approach is presented for the analysis of food industry policies that focuses on food industry firms. Data from a survey of Danish food firms (n=109) in 2003-04 are used to define and construct tables of winners and losers from 30 regulatory areas. Two forms of statistical test are employed in a grid-search to identify association between regulatory areas, types of firms, and patterns of winning and losing. Results indicate that the type of firm, rather than the policy instrument, determines patterns of winning and losing. Upstream and downstream ownership of assets by food industry firms, and their trade orientation, are shown to be the most important variables. For several policy areas the pattern of winning and losing is found not to be associated with any specific firm types, which indicates that their impact is neutral across all types of firms studied. Firm size was found to be poorly associated with firms' capacity to win and lose from several policies involving high-investment compliance..
机译:研究了政策对食品工业公司的影响。提出了一种新的方法来分析以食品工业公司为重点的食品工业政策。丹麦食品公司(n = 109)2003-04年的一项调查数据用于定义和构建30个监管领域的赢家和输家表格。网格搜索采用两种形式的统计测试,以识别监管区域,公司类型以及获利和失败模式之间的关联。结果表明,企业的类型而不是政策工具决定赢家和输家的方式。食品工业公司资产的上游和下游所有权及其贸易方向被证明是最重要的变量。对于几个政策领域,发现获胜和失败的模式与任何特定的公司类型都不相关,这表明其影响在所研究的所有类型的公司中都是中性的。发现企业规模与企业获胜能力和多项涉及高投资合规性的政策的输赢能力关系不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号