首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Applying quantitative benefit-risk analysis to aid regulatory decision making in diagnostic imaging: Methods, challenges, and opportunities
【24h】

Applying quantitative benefit-risk analysis to aid regulatory decision making in diagnostic imaging: Methods, challenges, and opportunities

机译:应用定量收益风险分析以帮助诊断成像方面的监管决策:方法,挑战和机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: Health agencies making regulatory marketing-authorization decisions use qualitative and quantitative approaches to assess expected benefits and expected risks associated with medical interventions. There is, however, no universal standard approach that regulatory agencies consistently use to conduct benefit-risk assessment (BRA) for pharmaceuticals or medical devices, including for imaging technologies. Economics, health services research, and health outcomes research use quantitative approaches to elicit preferences of stakeholders, identify priorities, and model health conditions and health intervention effects. Materials and Methods: Challenges to BRA in medical devices are outlined, highlighting additional barriers in radiology. Three quantitative methods-multi-criteria decision analysis, health outcomes modeling and stated-choice survey-are assessed using criteria that are important in balancing benefits and risks of medical devices and imaging technologies. Results: To be useful in regulatory BRA, quantitative methods need to: aggregate multiple benefits and risks, incorporate qualitative considerations, account for uncertainty, and make clear whose preferences/priorities are being used. Each quantitative method performs differently across these criteria and little is known about how BRA estimates and conclusions vary by approach. While no specific quantitative method is likely to be the strongest in all of the important areas, quantitative methods may have a place in BRA of medical devices and radiology. Discussion: Quantitative BRA approaches have been more widely applied in medicines, with fewer BRAs in devices. Despite substantial differences in characteristics of pharmaceuticals and devices, BRA methods may be as applicable to medical devices and imaging technologies as they are to pharmaceuticals. Further research to guide the development and selection of quantitative BRA methods for medical devices and imaging technologies is needed.
机译:理由和目标:制定监管性市场授权决策的卫生机构使用定性和定量方法来评估与医疗干预相关的预期收益和预期风险。但是,没有监管机构始终使用的通用标准方法来对药品或医疗设备(包括成像技术)进行利益风险评估(BRA)。经济学,健康服务研究和健康结果研究使用定量方法来引起利益相关者的偏好,确定优先级并为健康状况和健康干预效果建模。材料和方法:概述了医疗设备对BRA的挑战,突出了放射学的其他障碍。使用在平衡医疗设备和成像技术的收益和风险方面很重要的标准,评估了三种定量方法-多标准决策分析,健康结果建模和既定选择调查。结果:要在监管BRA中有用,定量方法需要:汇总多种收益和风险,纳入定性考虑因素,解决不确定性并明确使用谁的偏好/优先级。每种定量方法在这些标准上的执行方式都不同,对BRA估计和结论如何随方法变化知之甚少。尽管在所有重要领域中,没有一种特定的定量方法可能是最强的,但是定量方法可能在医疗设备和放射学的BRA中占有一席之地。讨论:定量BRA方法已在药物中得到更广泛的应用,而设备中的BRA却更少。尽管药物和设备的特性存在很大差异,但BRA方法可能适用于医疗设备和成像技术,也适用于药物。需要进行进一步的研究以指导开发和选择用于医疗设备和成像技术的定量BRA方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号