首页> 外文期刊>Academic radiology >Applying quantitative benefit-risk analysis to aid regulatory decision making in diagnostic imaging: Methods, challenges, and opportunities
【24h】

Applying quantitative benefit-risk analysis to aid regulatory decision making in diagnostic imaging: Methods, challenges, and opportunities

机译:应用定量益处风险分析辅助监管决策诊断成像:方法,挑战和机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Rationale and Objectives: Health agencies making regulatory marketing-authorization decisions use qualitative and quantitative approaches to assess expected benefits and expected risks associated with medical interventions. There is, however, no universal standard approach that regulatory agencies consistently use to conduct benefit-risk assessment (BRA) for pharmaceuticals or medical devices, including for imaging technologies. Economics, health services research, and health outcomes research use quantitative approaches to elicit preferences of stakeholders, identify priorities, and model health conditions and health intervention effects. Materials and Methods: Challenges to BRA in medical devices are outlined, highlighting additional barriers in radiology. Three quantitative methods-multi-criteria decision analysis, health outcomes modeling and stated-choice survey-are assessed using criteria that are important in balancing benefits and risks of medical devices and imaging technologies. Results: To be useful in regulatory BRA, quantitative methods need to: aggregate multiple benefits and risks, incorporate qualitative considerations, account for uncertainty, and make clear whose preferences/priorities are being used. Each quantitative method performs differently across these criteria and little is known about how BRA estimates and conclusions vary by approach. While no specific quantitative method is likely to be the strongest in all of the important areas, quantitative methods may have a place in BRA of medical devices and radiology. Discussion: Quantitative BRA approaches have been more widely applied in medicines, with fewer BRAs in devices. Despite substantial differences in characteristics of pharmaceuticals and devices, BRA methods may be as applicable to medical devices and imaging technologies as they are to pharmaceuticals. Further research to guide the development and selection of quantitative BRA methods for medical devices and imaging technologies is needed.
机译:理由和目标:卫生机构制定监管营销授权决策使用定性和定量方法来评估预期的效益和与医疗干预相关的预期风险。然而,没有通用标准方法,即监管机构一直用来对药物或医疗器械进行受益风险评估(BRA),包括用于成像技术。经济学,卫生服务研究和健康结果研究使用定量方法来引出利益相关者的偏好,确定优先事项和模型健康状况和健康干预效果。材料和方法:概述了对医疗器械中胸罩的挑战,突出了放射学的额外障碍。三种定量方法 - 多标准决策分析,使用标准评估了健康成果建模和说明调查 - 通过平衡益处和医疗器械和成像技术的风险重要。结果:在监管文胸中有用,定量方法需要:汇总多个福利和风险,包括定性考虑,占不确定性,并清楚地使用其偏好/优先事项。每种定量方法在这些标准上进行不同地执行,并且关于BRA估计和结论如何通过方法而众所周知。虽然在所有重要领域中没有特定的定量方法可能是最强的,但定量方法可能在医疗器械和放射学的胸罩中具有一个地方。讨论:在药品中,定量文胸方法更广泛地应用,装置中的较少胸罩。尽管药品和设备的特征具有显着差异,但是这种方法可以适用于医药和成像技术,因为它们是药物。需要进一步研究指导用于医疗器械和成像技术的定量文胸方法的开发和选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Academic radiology》 |2014年第9期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Pharmacy School of Pharmacy University of Washington 1959 NE Pacific St Seattle;

    Department of Pharmacy School of Pharmacy University of Washington 1959 NE Pacific St Seattle;

    Department of Radiology School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA United States;

    General Electric Healthcare Waukesha WI United States;

    Department of Pharmacy School of Pharmacy University of Washington 1959 NE Pacific St Seattle;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号