首页> 外文期刊>ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage >Using Survival Analysis on Conservation Metadata to Benchmark Treatment Frequency
【24h】

Using Survival Analysis on Conservation Metadata to Benchmark Treatment Frequency

机译:使用生存分析的保存元数据确定基准治疗频率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research addresses the question of what is an acceptable period between conservation treatments. Taking the cleaning of impressionist paintings as a case study, survival analysis is carried out on metadata from conservation records for the Tate, UK, the National Gallery in Oslo, Norway, and the National Trust, UK. Currently the only guidance available is offered by the National Trust. Based on cost-benefit analysis, it suggests an interval of 25 years for light surface cleaning and 100 years for major treatment. The majority of paintings held by the National Trust are pre-20th century, with a varnish layer protecting the paint surface. Arguments are put forward that this guidance cannot be applied to unvarnished paintings with exposed ground and a fragile paint layer. The cleaning process for these types of paintings poses a greater risk as it inevitably causes some loss of paint. Any cleaning of paintings in this category is more akin to a major conservation treatment. The Kaplan Meier Product Limit estimator uses metadata collected from the conservation records to estimate an average inter-cleaning period for the Tate, UK, and National Gallery, Oslo. The result of the theoretical analysis, although highly dependent on the quality of conservation records available, is supplemented by evidence from practical experience. Current views on acceptable frequency of cleaning and the associated risks of treatment are sought using a survey of conservators with experience of treating impressionist and post-impressionist paintings. This is applied to a case study of the Munch paintings in the University Aula, Oslo, that are currently unacceptably dirty. In the past, these paintings have been cleaned on average once every 14 years, which is clearly too often. The results suggest that the intercleaning period should be increased by a factor of three. Criteria are discussed for improving the environment within the University Aula, Oslo, to achieve this goal.
机译:这项研究解决了养护治疗之间可接受的期限是多少的问题。以印象派绘画的清洁为例,对英国泰特,挪威奥斯陆国家美术馆和英国国家信托基金会的保护记录中的元数据进行了生存分析。当前,唯一的可用指南是由国家信托基金会提供的。根据成本效益分析,建议进行轻质表面清洁的间隔时间为25年,而进行重大处理的间隔时间为100年。国家信托基金会(National Trust)持有的大多数绘画作品都是20世纪以前的作品,带有保护油漆表面的清漆层。有人提出该指导原则不适用于裸露地面和易碎油漆层的未上漆油漆。这些类型的绘画的清洁过程会带来更大的风险,因为它不可避免地会导致油漆损失。此类绘画的任何清洁都更类似于一种主要的保护措施。 Kaplan Meier产品限量估算器使用从保护记录中收集的元数据来估算英国泰特美术馆和奥斯陆国家美术馆的平均清洁间隔时间。理论分析的结果,尽管高度依赖于现有保护记录的质量,但有实践经验的证据作为补充。使用对印象派画家和印象派画家绘画有丰富经验的保管人的调查,寻求有关可接受的清洁频率和相关治疗风险的最新观点。这被用于对奥斯陆大学Aula的Munch绘画的案例研究,这些绘画目前是无法接受的。过去,这些画平均每14年清洗一次,这显然太频繁了。结果表明,清洗间隔时间应增加三倍。讨论了改善奥斯陆奥拉大学环境以实现此目标的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号