...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Commentary: what if high-quality care drove medical education? A multiattribute approach.
【24h】

Commentary: what if high-quality care drove medical education? A multiattribute approach.

机译:评论:如果高质量的护理带动了医学教育怎么办?多属性方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The current medical education model is based on the assumption that students progress from a mastery of basic mechanisms of human structure and function to an understanding of a variety of pathologies and treatments using sound scientific principles. In this commentary, the authors suggest another approach to developing medical school curricula. Starting with the major desired outcome of medical education, which they suggest should be high-quality medical care, educators can work backward using the attributes of quality as the basis for developing new medical curricula. The authors present, as an example, the Institute of Medicine definition of quality care--care that is safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered. These objectives and their attributes then can be useful for mapping current and future curricula in medical education and identifying deficits or possible excesses. A result of this approach might be the inclusion of such topics as epidemiology, process engineering, or aspects of the humanities or social sciences that build skills and knowledge in patient-centered care or safety while maintaining a balance with the need to preserve biomedical topics. Use of quality objectives and attributes to drive medical education should lead to improved alignment of the clinical and educational missions of academic medical centers, which, in turn, should lead to safer and higher quality care for patients.
机译:当前的医学教育模型是基于这样的假设,即学生从掌握人类结构和功能的基本机制发展到使用合理的科学原理理解各种病理学和治疗方法。在这篇评论中,作者提出了另一种开发医学院课程的方法。他们从医学教育的主要期望成果开始,他们认为应该是高质量的医学护理,教育工作者可以利用质量的属性作为基础来制定新的医学课程,从而向后努力。例如,作者介绍了医学研究所对优质护理的定义,即安全,及时,有效,高效,公平,以患者为中心的护理。这些目标及其属性随后可用于绘制医学教育中当前和将来的课程,并找出不足或可能的过度。这种方法的结果可能是包括流行病学,过程工程或人文或社会科学方面的主题,这些主题可以建立以患者为中心的护理或安全性方面的技能和知识,同时保持与保留生物医学主题的平衡。使用质量目标和属性来推动医学教育应导致学术医学中心的临床和教育使命更好地协调一致,从而应为患者提供更安全,更高质量的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号