...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic psychiatry: the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry >Introducing the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in the undergraduate psychiatric curriculum: Evaluation after one year
【24h】

Introducing the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in the undergraduate psychiatric curriculum: Evaluation after one year

机译:在本科精神病学课程中引入客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):一年后评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was introduced in undergraduate psychiatry clerkship in 2008. The authors studied the effect of OSCE on the students' performance. Methods: The "short case" (SC) and "oral examination" (OE), two of the five components of the previous assessment format, were replaced with the OSCE. Results were compared with those of the 2007 students. Results: The introduction of the OSCE had little impact on the overall scores, but the 2007 students had significantly higher scores on the essay examination and long case, whereas the 2008 group had significantly higher scores on the OSCE (versus the OE for the 2007 group). In comparing the top 10 scoring students from the two classes, the 2007-year students had significantly higher overall scores, both on end-of-course tests and the annual examinations. In particular, the scores for the OSCE exams for the 2008 class were significantly lower than the scores for the OE in the 2007 class. Conclusion: The higher scores on OSCE in Year 2008 suggest that students performed better on clinical skills and professional development than recall on the factual-knowledge domains. Since the changes were introduced in the year 2008, the comparison can best be regarded as qualitative, and it is probably too early to judge the impact of the OSCE. Further studies to determine validity of the OSCE are needed.
机译:目的:在2008年的本科精神科业务中引入了客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。作者研究了OSCE对学生表现的影响。方法:以前的评估形式的五个组成部分中的“短案”(SC)和“口试”(OE)被欧安组织取代。将结果与2007年的学生进行比较。结果:引入OSCE对总分的影响不大,但是2007年的学生在作文考试和长期案例中的得分明显较高,而2008年的学生在OSCE上的得分显着较高(与2007年的OE相比) )。在比较两个班的前10名得分最高的学生时,无论是课程结束测试还是年度考试,2007年级学生的总体得分都明显更高。特别是,2008年级的OSCE考试分数明显低于2007年级的OE分数。结论:2008年OSCE得分较高,表明学生在临床技能和专业发展方面的表现要优于对事实知识领域的回忆。由于这些更改是在2008年引入的,因此最好将这种比较视为定性的,现在判断欧安组织的影响可能为时尚早。需要进一步研究以确定欧安组织的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号